Pseudopapilledema

Watchlist
Retrieved
2019-09-22
Source
Trials
Genes
Drugs

Hoyt and Pont (1962) described 28 patients with an anomalous elevation of the optic disc, who were first thought to have brain tumors. Identical twins were affected. McKusick (1963) observed affected father and daughter and thought 'buried drusen' to be the cause. Jacquemin (1964) reported mother and 2 daughters. There may be more than one type of pseudopapilledema. Fite and Lewis (1966) described father and 2 sons with a type due apparently to 'hyperemia.' Singleton et al. (1973) reported 3 families with pseudopapilledema, which was present in 1 member of each of 3 generations in 1 family and in 1 member of each of 2 generations in the other 2 families. There was no case of male-to-male transmission in these kindreds.

Kurz-Levin and Landau (1999) reviewed the clinical records of 142 patients with possible pseudopapilledema. Thirty-six of the 261 eyes reviewed had been imaged with 3 techniques: B-scan ultrasonography, CT scanning, and preinjection control photography. The authors concluded that drusen of the optic nerve head are most reliably diagnosed using B-scan echography.

Diduszyn et al. (2002) reported bilateral visual loss in a patient with optic disc drusen (ODD) and POEMS syndrome (see 192240). Visual loss occurred when the patient developed peripapillary choroidal neovascularization and subsequent hemorrhage in the subretinal space. The authors hypothesized that the elevated VEGF (192240) due to POEMS syndrome might have played a role in the development of choroidal neovascularization.

Purvin et al. (2004) reviewed medical records of 20 patients who experienced an episode of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION; 258660) in an eye with ODD. The authors found that their patients were strikingly similar to those with NAION unassociated with drusen with regard to prevalence of vascular risk factors, pattern of visual field loss, and occurrence of a subsequent similar event in the other eye. In contrast, however, patients with ODD and NAION were younger than those with NAION, were more likely to report preceding episodes of transient visual obscuration, and had a more favorable visual outcome.