Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility

Summary

Clinical characteristics.

Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) is a pharmacogenetic disorder of skeletal muscle calcium regulation associated with uncontrolled skeletal muscle hypermetabolism. Manifestations of malignant hyperthermia (MH) are precipitated by certain volatile anesthetics (i.e., halothane, isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane, enflurane), either alone or in conjunction with a depolarizing muscle relaxant (specifically, succinylcholine). The triggering substances cause uncontrolled release of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum and may promote entry of extracellular calcium into the myoplasm, causing contracture of skeletal muscles, glycogenolysis, and increased cellular metabolism, resulting in production of heat and excess lactate. Affected individuals experience acidosis, hypercapnia, tachycardia, hyperthermia, muscle rigidity, compartment syndrome, rhabdomyolysis with subsequent increase in serum creatine kinase (CK) concentration, hyperkalemia with a risk for cardiac arrhythmia or even cardiac arrest, and myoglobinuria with a risk for renal failure. In nearly all cases, the first manifestations of MH (tachycardia and tachypnea) occur in the operating room; however, MH may also occur in the early postoperative period. There is mounting evidence that some individuals with MHS will also develop MH with exercise and/or on exposure to hot environments. Without proper and prompt treatment with dantrolene sodium, mortality is extremely high.

Diagnosis/testing.

The diagnosis of MHS is established with in vitro muscle contracture testing by measuring the contracture responses of biopsied muscle samples to halothane and graded concentrations of caffeine. The diagnosis of MHS can also be established by identification of a pathogenic variant in CACNA1S, RYR1, or STAC3 on molecular genetic testing.

Management.

Treatment of manifestations: Early diagnosis of an MH episode is essential. Successful treatment of an acute episode of MH includes: discontinuation of potent inhalation agents and succinylcholine; increase in minute ventilation to lower end-tidal CO2; use of MHAUS helpline; administration of dantrolene sodium intravenously; cooling measures if body temperature is >38.5° C; treatment of cardiac arrhythmias if needed (do not use calcium channel blockers); monitoring blood gases, serum concentrations of electrolytes and CK, blood and urine for myoglobin, and coagulation profile; treatment of metabolic abnormalities.

Prevention of primary manifestations: Individuals with MHS should not be exposed to potent volatile agents and succinylcholine. Individuals undergoing general anesthetics that exceed 30 minutes in duration should have their temperature monitored using an electronic temperature probe. Individuals with MHS should carry proper identification as to their susceptibility.

Agents/circumstances to avoid: Avoid potent inhalation anesthetics and succinylcholine. Calcium channel blockers should not be given together with dantrolene due to a potential cardiac depressant effect. Serotonin antagonist (5HT3-antagonist) antiemetics should be used cautiously. Individuals with MHS should avoid extremes of heat, but not restrict athletic activity unless there is a history of overt rhabdomyolysis and/or heat stroke. Strenuous activities at high ambient temperatures should be avoided or performed with caution. In individuals with MH undergoing cardiac bypass surgery, aggressive rewarming should be avoided, as it may be associated with development of clinical signs of MH.

Evaluation of relatives at risk: If the MHS-causative pathogenic variant in the family is known, molecular genetic testing can be used to established increased risk of MH in a heterozygous individual; molecular genetic testing alone cannot be used to identify family members who are not at increased risk for MH due to other possible genetic risk factors. If the pathogenic variant in the family is not known or if an at-risk relative is found to be negative for a familial pathogenic variant, muscle contracture testing can be used to assess susceptibility to MH.

Pregnancy management: If a pregnant woman with MHS requires a non-emergent surgery, a non-triggering anesthetic (local, nerve block, epidural, spinal anesthesia, or a total intravenous general anesthetic) should be administered. Continuous epidural analgesia is highly recommended for labor and delivery. If a cesarean delivery is indicated in a woman who does not have an epidural catheter in place, neuraxial (spinal, epidural, or combined spinal-epidural) anesthesia is recommended (if not otherwise contraindicated). If a general anesthetic is indicated, a total intravenous anesthetic technique should be administered, with an anesthesia machine that has been prepared for an MH-susceptible individual.

Genetic counseling.

Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) is an autosomal dominant disorder. Most individuals diagnosed with MHS have a parent with MHS, although the parent may not have experienced an episode of MH. The proportion of individuals with MHS caused by a de novo pathogenic variant is unknown. Each child of an individual with MHS has a 50% chance of inheriting a causative pathogenic variant. Prenatal teesting for a pregnancy at increased risk is possible if there is a known MH pathogenic variant in the family.

Diagnosis

Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) have been published [Glahn et al 2010, Larach et al 2012, Hopkins et al 2015, Riazi et al 2018].

Suggestive Findings

MHS should be suspected in individuals presenting with clinical findings summarized in Table 1. The findings relate to signs occurring during or shortly after general anesthesia.

Each clinical finding is weighted as to significance in being associated with MHS as determined by malignant hyperthermia (MH) experts using a Delphi method. Points are assigned according to weight and are then totaled to produce a raw score, which translates to a likelihood of MH score, ranging from a raw score of 0 (MH rank 1: almost never/very unlikely) to a raw score ≥50 (MH rank 6: almost certain) [Larach et al 1994]. The more criteria an individual fulfills, the more likely that an MH episode has occurred. For example, with only temperature elevation during anesthesia, an individual is not likely to be susceptible to MH. A limitation of the scoring system is that not every clinical finding may be measured (e.g., arterial blood gas); MH may also recognized very quickly and treated before all the signs appear.

Table 1.

Criteria Used in the Clinical Grading Scale for Malignant Hyperthermia

Clinical Finding (Maximum Score) 1Manifestation 2
Respiratory acidosis (15)End-tidal CO2 >55 mmHg, PaCO2 >60 mmHg
Cardiac involvement (3)Unexplained sinus tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia, or ventricular fibrillation
Metabolic acidosis (10)Base deficit >8 mEq/L, pH <7.25
Muscle rigidity (15)Generalized rigidity, severe masseter muscle rigidity
Muscle breakdown (15)Serum creatine kinase concentration >20,000/L units, cola-colored urine, excess myoglobin in urine or serum, plasma [K+] >6 mEq/L
Temperature increase (15)Rapidly increasing temperature, T >38.8° C
OtherRapid reversal of MH signs with dantrolene (score=5), elevated resting serum creatine kinase concentration (score=10)
Family history (15)Consistent with autosomal dominant inheritance

From Larach et al [1994], Rosenberg et al [2015]

1.

Clinical findings (except family history) are in order of relative importance.

2.

Signs occurring during or shortly after general anesthesia in the untreated individual

Indications for Muscle Biopsy and Contracture Testing to Confirm the Diagnosis in a Proband *

Definite indications

  • Proband with a suspected clinical history of MH
  • First-degree relative of a proband with a clinical history of MH, if the proband cannot be tested (e.g., too young, too old, MH death, not willing to undergo the muscle biopsy, no test center available)
  • At-risk family members when the MH-causing variant is not known
  • Severe masseter muscle rigidity along with generalized rigidity during anesthesia with MH-triggering agents
  • Isolated masseter muscle rigidity with succinylcholine
  • Limited masseter muscle rigidity along with rhabdomyolysis and/or elevated plasma CK level (hyperCKemia)
  • Military service. The military requires determination of MH susceptibility by contracture testing in persons with a suspected personal or known family history of MH because individuals with MHS are not eligible for military service.

Possible indications. Debate exists as to other indications for diagnostic MH muscle biopsy. Some experts believe that individuals who experience any one of the following signs should undergo biopsy, following careful discussion of the pros and cons of the test:

  • Postoperative rhabdomyolysis and marked elevation of serum CK concentration without other signs of classic MH
  • Exercise-related rhabdomyolysis in the absence of a known myopathy

Not recommended

  • Weight less than about 20 kg or age younger than five years
  • Diagnosis of neuroleptic malignant syndrome or serotonin syndrome

* Because contracture testing is available on a limited basis, some physicians consider all individuals with a suspected history of MH as MH susceptible and avoid anesthetic agents known to trigger MH. Although this strategy is useful, it does not provide guidance and specific answers to family members and limits the anesthetic options for the individual and family. Details regarding MH muscle biopsy centers can be obtained from the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the US website (www.mhaus.org).

Indications for Molecular Genetic Testing

(See Establishing the Diagnosis, Note.)

  • Confirmed clinical episode of MH
  • Positive caffeine/halothane contracture test
  • High likelihood of having experienced an MH episode, as determined by biopsy center/hotline consultants, and/or likely MH based on the Clinical Grading Scale (see Table 1)
  • Relative with a positive contracture test or a known MH-causing variant
  • Unexplained death with signs of MH during or immediately after anesthesia
  • Exercise-related rhabdomyolysis and/or heat stroke

Establishing the Diagnosis

The diagnosis of MHS is established in a proband with:

  • A positive diagnostic contracture test OR
  • A heterozygous pathogenic variant in one of the genes listed in Table 3 identified by molecular genetic testing.

Note: (1) Molecular genetic testing is not 100% sensitive; MHS cannot be excluded based on failure to identify a pathogenic variant in one of the genes listed in Table 3. In such cases contracture testing should be performed at an MH muscle biopsy center. (2) A variant is established as pathogenic through variant assessment that includes functional analysis (see Molecular Genetics).

Contracture Test

Since the mid-1970s, the standard diagnostic test for MHS has been the in vitro measurement of contracture response of biopsied muscle to graded concentrations of caffeine and the anesthetic halothane. The test is referred to as the caffeine/halothane contracture test (CHCT) in North America and the in vitro contracture test (IVCT) in Europe and elsewhere. (Note: The calcium-induced calcium release test is used only in Japan, and no international standards exist.)

  • The test must be performed on a biopsy of approximately 2.0 g of muscle from the vastus lateralis or medialis (some centers have used biopsies from other muscle groups, but the test has only been standardized for the vastus muscle group) within five hours of harvesting. Usually, the individual must be at an MH diagnostic center in order to undergo testing.
  • The individual is anesthetized with general anesthesia, spinal anesthetic or with a femoral nerve block or one of its variants:
    • Direct muscle infiltration with local anesthetic is contraindicated because it could affect tissue viability.
    • In all cases, the anesthetic drugs used must be safe for MH-susceptible individuals.
  • The surgeon must not use electrocautery or stretch the muscle.

Muscle bundles weighing 100-150 mg are mounted in a chamber containing buffered solution and, after a period of stabilization, are caused to contract with supramaximal electrical stimuli. The isometric contracture that develops following exposure to pharmacologic agents that cause sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium release (e.g., halothane, caffeine, and ryanodine) is measured.

The two versions of the testing protocol with international standards of test performance and interpretation are the North American [Litman & Rosenberg 2005] and the European versions [Hopkins et al 2015]. The essential differences are: (1) the North American protocol utilizes exposure to 3% halothane, while the European version utilizes incremental exposure to halothane; and (2) the North American version requires testing of three muscle bundles for each drug, whereas the European version requires testing of two muscle bundles for each drug (see Table 2).

Table 2.

Testing Protocols for Malignant Hyperthermia

DesignationNorth American Protocol 1DesignationEuropean Protocol 2
MHS
  • Contracture of ≥0.7 g to 3% halothane; OR
  • Contracture of ≥0.3 g to 2.0 mmol/L caffeine
MHShc
  • Contracture of ≥0.2 g to ≤2% halothane; AND
  • Contracture of ≥0.2 g to ≤2.0 mmol/L caffeine
MHSContracture to:
  • Halothane only; OR
  • Caffeine only
MHSh 3 or MHSc 3Contracture to:
  • Halothane only; OR
  • Caffeine only
MHN
  • No contracture; OR
  • Contracture of <0.7 g to halothane; OR
  • Contracture of <0.3 g to 2.0 mmol/L caffeine
MHNNo significant contractures to either agent

MHN = malignant hyperthermia negative; MHS = malignant hyperthermia susceptible; MHSc = malignant hyperthermia susceptible with contracture after caffeine exposure; MHSh = malignant hyperthermia susceptible with contracture after halothane exposure; MHShc = malignant hyperthermia susceptible with contracture after halothane exposure and after caffeine exposure

Note: (1) Studies to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the contracture test show that both protocols have a sensitivity of about 100%. Specificity is generally between 80% and 97%, according to several studies with these protocols [Allen et al 1998]. (2) Some laboratories employ 1.0 or 2.0 μmol/L ryanodine or 4-chloro-m-chlorocresol in addition to halothane and caffeine to clarify equivocal results.

1.

In the North American protocol, most centers report results as MHS or MHN.

2.

Hopkins et al [2015]

3.

MHSc, and MHSh are both considered MHS.

Molecular Genetic Testing: Recommended Tier 1

When the clinical and laboratory findings suggest the diagnosis of MHS, molecular genetic testing approaches should include use of a multigene panel. A MHS multigene panel that includes CACNA1S, RYR1, STAC3, and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition at the most reasonable cost while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.

For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.

Molecular Genetic Testing: Tier 2

Comprehensive genomic testing (when available) including exome sequencing and genome sequencing may be considered if gene-targeted testing did not identify a pathogenic variant in an individual with a positive contracture test.

Exome sequencing is most commonly used; genome sequencing is also possible. If exome sequencing is not diagnostic – and particularly when evidence supports autosomal dominant inheritance – exome array (when clinically available) may be considered to detect (multi)exon deletions or duplications that cannot be detected by sequence analysis.

For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.

Table 3.

Molecular Genetic Testing Used in Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility (MHS)

Gene 1, 2Proportion of MHS Attributed to Pathogenic Variants in GeneProportion of Pathogenic Variants 3 Detectable by Method
Sequence analysis 4Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 5
CACNA1S~1% 6~100%Unknown 7
RYR150%-60% 8~100%2 families 9
STAC3<1% 10~100%Unknown 7
Unknown 11Up to 40%NA
1.

Genes are listed in alphabetic order.

2.

See Table A. Genes and Databases for chromosome locus and protein.

3.

See Molecular Genetics for information on allelic variants detected in this gene.

4.

Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Pathogenic variants may include small intragenic deletions/insertions and missense, nonsense, and splice site variants; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.

5.

Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications. Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include: quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications.

6.

Monnier et al [1997], Stewart et al [2001]

7.

No data on detection rate of gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis are available.

8.

Sambuughin et al [2005], Galli et al [2006], Robinson et al [2006], Kraeva et al [2011]

9.

Sambuughin et al [2001a]

10.

Horstick et al [2013], Zaharieva et al [2018]

11.

Up to 30% of individuals with MHS do not have an identified pathogenic variant in any of the genes in Table 1. MHS has been linked to 17q11.2-q24, 3q13.1, 5p, and 7q21-q22; however, no additional MH-related candidate genes have been identified.

Clinical Characteristics

Clinical Description

The manifestations of malignant hyperthermia (MH) result from exposure to certain volatile anesthetic agents (i.e., halothane, isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane, and enflurane) that act as triggers either alone or in conjunction with succinylcholine, a depolarizing muscle relaxant. MH is an inherited pharmacogenetic disorder of calcium regulation resulting in uncontrolled skeletal muscle hypermetabolism [Rosenberg et al 2015] with variable clinical presentations (depending on the triggering agents and environmental factors, such as metabolic state and body temperature) at the beginning of anesthesia.

The triggering substances initiate uncontrolled release of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum via the skeletal muscle calcium release channel (RyR1), and also may promote entry of extracellular calcium into the myoplasm leading to the sustained pathologic increase in cytosolic calcium in skeletal muscle cells [Yang et al 2007, Duke et al 2010, Riazi et al 2018]. Increased myoplasmic calcium causes contracture of skeletal muscles and activates glycogenolysis and cell metabolism, resulting in excessive production of heat and excess lactate. Activation of the oxidative cycle leads to high oxygen consumption and high carbon dioxide production.

MH clinical manifestations are variable; with prompt and rapid clinical response, some signs may not appear. Hypercapnia is common, as is tachycardia. Hyperthermia may be one of the early signs of MH. However, failure to monitor core temperature may lead to a delay in detecting hyperthermia. Skin temperature measurement is often misleading during MH crises [Larach et al 2010]. Acidosis may be mild if the syndrome is recognized and treated promptly. HyperCKemia and rhabdomyolysis are more common when succinylcholine has been used but may be mild or not appear at all in some individuals, for reasons that are not clear. In some instances rhabdomyolysis does not appear for several hours. Hyperkalemia, leading to cardiac arrhythmia and even arrest, is uncommon if the syndrome is detected and treated promptly but may develop with remarkable rapidity.

In survivors, normalization of edematous muscle and serum CK concentration occurs within ten to 15 days, but symptom resolution may take longer (Figure 1) [Jurkat-Rott et al 2000].

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Clinical features of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility Note: Early diagnosis and rapid therapy are both life saving and lead to a reduction of clinical symptoms.

MH may appear at any point during anesthetization or within an hour or so after termination of anesthesia. If succinylcholine is used during induction of anesthesia, an acceleration of the manifestations of MH may occur; tachycardia, elevation of end-tidal carbon dioxide levels, hypertension, marked temperature elevation, and arrhythmias are seen over the course of five to ten minutes. However, a completely normal response to succinylcholine may be present in some individuals susceptible to MH; in these individuals, a potent inhalation agent is apparently necessary to trigger the syndrome.

In almost all instances, the first manifestations of MH occur in the operating room. In classic MH, the initial signs are tachycardia, rapidly rising end-tidal C02, and tachypnea. Tachypnea is usually not recognized because most individuals receiving general anesthesia are paralyzed. Shortly after the heart rate increases, the blood pressure may increase, often associated with ventricular arrhythmias induced by sympathetic nervous system stimulation from hypercarbia, hyperkalemia, and catecholamine release. Thereafter, muscle rigidity or increased muscle tone may become apparent; and body temperature increases at a rate of 1°-2° C every five minutes.

At the same time, the CO2 absorbent used in general anesthesia becomes activated and warm to the touch from the exothermic reaction with the CO2 exhaled by the affected individual. The individual may display peripheral mottling, on occasion sweating, and in rare cases cyanosis. Blood gas analysis usually reveals hypercarbia (PCO2>60 mmHg) and respiratory and metabolic acidosis without oxygen desaturation. Elevation of end-tidal CO2 greater than 55 mmHg is one of the earliest signs of MH; however, vigorous mechanical hyperventilation may prevent hypercarbia and delay the diagnosis [Karan et al 1994]. A mixed venous blood sample shows even more evidence of CO2 retention and metabolic acidosis. Hyperkalemia, hypercalcemia, lactacidemia, and myoglobinuria are characteristic but not always present. Increase in serum CK concentration often exceeds 20,000 units/L in the first 12-24 hours.

Death results unless the individual is promptly treated (see Management). Even with treatment and survival, the individual is at risk for life-threatening myoglobinuric renal failure, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), compartment syndrome, and recrudescence of the syndrome within the first 24-36 hours following the episode. A study of MH using a North American MH registry containing information about affected individuals reported between 1987 and 2006 showed that nonfatal complications occurred in 35% of these individuals. Twelve of these complications included cardiac, renal, or hepatic dysfunction; coma or change in consciousness level; pulmonary edema; and DIC [Larach et al 2010].

Early diagnosis and rapid therapy are life saving and also lead to a reduction of clinical symptoms. It should be noted that modern anesthetic care and monitoring often allow early detection of MH. Treatment with dantrolene results in much lower morbidity and mortality than first reported when MH was recognized in the 1960s [Larach et al 2008]; however, mortality may be as high as 11% [Rosero et al 2009]. The likelihood of any complication increased 2.9 times per 2° C increase in maximum temperature and 1.6 times per 30-minute delay in dantrolene administration [Larach et al 2010]. The most frequent complications associated with dantrolene administration are muscle weakness (14.6%), phlebitis (9.2%), and gastrointestinal upset (4.3%). There is a 25% increase in the risk for any of the above complications when the total dose of dantrolene as required by clinical indications is twice the recommended initial treatment dose of 2.5 mg/kg [Brandom et al 2011].

The presentation of MH outside a hospital setting may pose special problems. Several deaths from MH have occurred when the episode began in an ambulatory surgery setting. Probable causes include inadequate preparation for treating MH (including absence of dantrolene), insufficient and unprepared personnel, and problems in stabilizing an affected individual prior to transfer to a hospital. It is suggested that all facilities have a plan to deal with MH and hold practice drills at regular intervals (see Larach et al [2012] for transfer-of-care protocols).

MH may also occur in the early postoperative period, usually within the first hour of recovery from anesthesia. Characteristic tachycardia, tachypnea, hypertension, and arrhythmias presage an episode of MH. Isolated myoglobinuria without an obvious increase in metabolism in the postoperative period (≤24 hours) should alert the anesthesiologist to the possibility of MH.

Of note, an MH episode may not occur with every exposure to "trigger" agents; clinical manifestations depend on genetic predisposition, dose of trigger agents, and duration of trigger exposure.

Signs of MH have also been reported without exposure to anesthetic agents. In some cases signs follow overdose of MDMA agonists; in other cases MH may be associated with heat and exercise.

Environmental/Exertional Heat Stress

Recent clinical, genetic, and laboratory studies using animal models provide evidence for a relationship between environmental or exertional heat stress (EHS) and MHS [Chelu et al 2006, Yang et al 2006, Durham et al 2008, Lanner et al 2012]. Some individuals who have experienced exertional heat illness have been found to be MH susceptible based on contracture testing [Capacchione & Muldoon 2009]. In one study, one third of young military recruits who experienced exercise-induced heat illness had an abnormal contracture response.

Evidence of a relation between EHS and MHS is presented by Tobin et al [2001] in the case report of a boy age 12 years who died from an MH-like event following participation in a football game. The boy had recovered from a previous clinical MH episode during general anesthesia with sevoflurane; sequence analysis revealed that both the boy and his father had a common RYR1 pathogenic variant (p.Arg163Cys). A more recent study found that two unrelated children who experienced fatal non-anesthetic awake episodes triggered by either a viral prodrome or exposure to environmental heat stress possessed an identical RYR1 variant (p.Arg3983Cys), while one of the children also had a second variant (p.Asp4505His) [Groom et al 2011].

MHS Phenotypes

Several distinct RYR1-related myopathies can predispose to classic MH:

  • Central core disease (OMIM 117000) and multiminicore disease (OMIM 255320) are myopathies caused by mutation of RYR1. Muscle weakness can range from mild to severe. Most affected individuals have mild disease with symmetric proximal muscle weakness & variable involvement of facial & neck muscles. Motor development is usually delayed, but most affected individuals acquire independent ambulation. Severe disease is early in onset with profound hypotonia often accompanied by poor fetal movement, spinal deformities, hip dislocation, joint contractures, poor suck, and respiratory insufficiency requiring assisted ventilation. Multiminocore disease is broadly classified into four groups: classic form, moderate form with hand involvement, antenatal form with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita, and ophthalmoplegic form. About 75% of affected individuals have classic symptoms characterized by neonatal hypotonia, delayed motor development, and axial muscle weakness, which leads to development of scoliosis and significant respiratory involvement; varying severity of spinal rigidity is present. Each of the other three forms is seen in fewer than 10% of individuals.
  • King or King-Denborough syndrome (OMIM 145600) is characterized by: distinctive facies, ptosis, downslanted palpebral fissures, widely spaced eyes, epicanthal folds, low-set ears, malar hypoplasia, micrognathia, high-arched palate, clinodactyly, single palmar crease, pectus excavatum, winging of the scapulae, lumbar lordosis, and mild thoracic scoliosis. Individuals present with hypotonia at birth, slightly delayed motor development, diffuse joint hyperextensibility, and mild proximal muscle weakness. Muscle biopsy reveals minimal but identifiable changes represented by fiber size variability, type I fiber predominance and atrophy, perimysial fibrous infiltration, and some disarray of the intermyofibrillary network. Pathogenic variants in RYR1 have been found in some individuals with King-Denborough syndrome.
  • STAC3 disorder (Native American myopathy), caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in STAC3, is characterized by congenital myopathy and musculoskeletal involvement of the trunk and extremities. Most children have weakness with myopathic facies, progressive kyphoscoliosis, and contractures. Other common findings are palatal anomalies (including cleft palate) and short stature. Risks for MHS and restrictive lung disease are increased. Intellect is typically normal.

Other RYR1 allelic conditions associated with MH susceptibility:

  • Vladutiu et al [2011] revealed that variants in RYR1 may contribute to the underlying genetic risk for non-anesthesia-induced myopathies, such as statin-induced myopathy.
  • In a study of 12 young men with exercise-induced rhabdomyolysis (ER), ten were determined to be MH susceptible on contracture testing and three had known MHS RYR1 pathogenic variants [Wappler et al 2001]. In addition, the two RYR1 pathogenic variants p.Arg401Cys and p.Arg614Cys are associated with MHS, EHS, and ER [Davis et al 2002].
  • RYR1 variants have also been found to underlie ER in African American men [Sambuughin et al 2009]. This study identified three novel RYR1 variants: p.Ala933Thr, p.Gly2160Ser, and p.Thr4294Met, in individuals with ER.
  • Retrospective data on Canadian individuals with MHS and ER showed that an RYR1 or CACNA1S pathogenic variant was identified in three of 17 individuals [Kraeva et al 2017].

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

Genotype-phenotype correlations in MHS are difficult to study. No correlation between genotype and clinical phenotype is apparent because caffeine/halothane contracture test / in vitro contracture test results are variable among diagnostic laboratories, and clinical episodes of MHS that fulfill all criteria are rare because of successful intervention during anesthetic complications.

A limited number of studies have addressed genotype-phenotype correlations in individuals with RYR1-related MHS [Robinson et al 2002, Robinson et al 2003, Carpenter et al 2009]. Stronger contractures and shorter response times in the response to caffeine have been reported in individuals with an RYR1 pathogenic variant [Carpenter et al 2009].

No genotype-phenotype correlations for STAC3 have been identified.

No genotype-phenotype correlations for CACNA1S have been identified.

Penetrance

In a multicenter case-control study, the overall penetrance for RYR1-related MHS was 40.6%. The probability of developing MH on exposure to triggers was 0.25 among all individuals with an RYR1 pathogenic variant and 0.76 in survivors of MH reactions (95% CI of the difference 0.41 to 0.59) [Ibarra Moreno et al 2019].

Prevalence

The incidence of MH is best described by the reported incidence per anesthetic. The estimates of the incidence range from one in 3,000 anesthetics to one in 50,000 anesthetics, with most estimating an incidence in children of about one in 10,000 anesthetics and in adults of one in 50,000 anesthetics. The prevalence of MH in individuals undergoing surgery in New York state hospitals was estimated at 1:100,000 for adults [Brady et al 2009] and 3:100,000 for children [Li et al 2011]. Because many individuals who experience marked hyperthermia while undergoing surgery may be coded as being MH susceptible, the exact incidence and prevalence has been difficult to clarify. It appears certain that there are more than 1,000 cases of MH in the US each year [Brandom & Muldoon 2004]. The incidence varies depending on the routine use of trigger anesthetics.

Gonsalves et al [2013] identified a prevalence of 0.46% (4/870) for MHS-related RYR1 pathogenic variants. Based on genetic variation data of more than 60,000 individuals (gnomad.broadinstitute.org; accessed 9-19-2019), the combined prevalence of MHS-related RYR1 pathogenic variants was estimated at 1:2750 [Riazi et al 2018]. Using RYR1 and CACNA1S genomic databases, the estimated prevalence of an MHS-related pathogenic variant was 1:1556 [Mungunsukh et al 2019].

Differential Diagnosis

Malignant hyperthermia (MH). The combination of hypercarbia, muscle rigidity, tachycardia, hyperthermia, metabolic acidosis, and rhabdomyolysis during or shortly after anesthesia is distinctive for MH. Some conditions share elements of MH (see Tables 5a and 5b).

Table 5a.

Acquired Conditions to Consider in the Differential Diagnosis of Malignant Hyperthermia (MH)

ConditionFeaturesComment
SepsisHyperthermia, hypercarbia, & acidosisRigidity & marked ↑ of serum CK concentration are uncommon; leukocytosis (typically present w/sepsis) is uncommon in MH.