Cockayne Syndrome

Summary

Clinical characteristics.

Cockayne syndrome (referred to as CS in this GeneReview) spans a continuous phenotypic spectrum that includes:

  • CS type I, the "classic" or "moderate" form;
  • CS type II, a more severe form with symptoms present at birth; this form overlaps with cerebrooculofacioskeletal (COFS) syndrome;
  • CS type III, a milder and later-onset form;
  • COFS syndrome, a fetal form of CS.

CS type I is characterized by normal prenatal growth with the onset of growth and developmental abnormalities in the first two years. By the time the disease has become fully manifest, height, weight, and head circumference are far below the fifth percentile. Progressive impairment of vision, hearing, and central and peripheral nervous system function leads to severe disability; death typically occurs in the first or second decade.

CS type II is characterized by growth failure at birth, with little or no postnatal neurologic development. Congenital cataracts or other structural anomalies of the eye may be present. Affected children have early postnatal contractures of the spine (kyphosis, scoliosis) and joints. Death usually occurs by age five years.

CS type III is a phenotype in which major clinical features associated with CS only become apparent after age two years; growth and/or cognition exceeds the expectations for CS type I.

COFS syndrome is characterized by very severe prenatal developmental anomalies (arthrogryposis and microphthalmia).

Diagnosis/testing.

The diagnosis of Cockayne syndrome is established in a proband with the identification of biallelic pathogenic variants in ERCC6 or ERCC8 on molecular genetic testing.

Management.

Treatment of manifestations: Feeding gastrostomy tube placement as needed; individualized educational programs for developmental delay; medications for tremor and spasticity as needed; physical therapy to prevent contractures; use of sunglasses for lens/retina protection; treatment of cataracts, and other ophthalmologic complications, hearing loss, hypertension, and gastroesophageal reflux as in the general population. Aggressive dental care to minimize dental caries; use of sunscreens and limitation of sun exposure for cutaneous photosensitivity.

Surveillance: Biannual assessment of diet, nervous system, and ophthalmologic status. Yearly assessment for complications such as hearing loss, hepatic or renal dysfunction, and hypertension.

Agents/circumstances to avoid: Excessive sun exposure and use of metronidazole. Extra vigilance is needed for opioid and sedative use. Use of growth hormone treatment is not recommended in those with CS.

Genetic counseling.

Cockayne syndrome is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. At conception, each sib of an affected individual has a 25% chance of being affected, a 50% chance of being an asymptomatic carrier, and a 25% chance of being unaffected and not a carrier. Carrier testing for at-risk relatives, prenatal testing for a pregnancy at increased risk, and preimplantation genetic testing are possible if the ERCC6 or ERCC8 pathogenic variants in the family are known.

Diagnosis

Cockayne syndrome (CS) is characterized by growth failure and multisystemic involvement, with a variable age of onset and rate of progression. To facilitate clinical recognition and follow up, the phenotypic spectrum of CS can be divided into different clinical presentations. Note, however, that among all individuals with CS there is a continuous spectrum of clinical severities without clear thresholds and that intermediate phenotypes may arise:

  • Cockayne syndrome type I, "classic" CS, in which the major features of the disease become apparent by age one to two years
  • Cockayne syndrome type II, a more severe form with abnormalities recognized at birth or in the early neonatal period
  • Cockayne syndrome type III, milder/later-onset forms in which major features only become apparent after age two years
  • Cerebrooculofacioskeletal (COFS) syndrome, very severe fetal phenotype with arthrogryposis, prenatal growth failure, prenatal microcephaly, congenital cataracts or microphthalmia

Formal clinical diagnostic criteria originally proposed for CS type I [Nance & Berry 1992] have been revised and extended in more recent publications [Natale 2011, Laugel 2013]. Because of the progressive nature of CS, the clinical diagnosis becomes more certain as additional signs and symptoms gradually manifest over time.

Suggestive Findings

Cockayne syndrome should be suspected in individuals with the following findings.

Major criteria

  • Postnatal growth failure (height and weight <5th centile by age 2 years)
  • Progressive microcephaly and neurologic dysfunction manifested as early developmental delay in most individuals, followed by progressive behavioral and intellectual deterioration in all individuals; brain MRI reveals white matter dysmyelination and cerebellar atrophy [Koob et al 2010, Koob et al 2016]. Intracranial calcifications (mainly located in the basal ganglia) are seen in some individuals.

Minor criteria

  • Cutaneous photosensitivity
  • Demyelinating peripheral neuropathy diagnosed by nerve conduction testing
  • Pigmentary retinopathy and/or cataracts
  • Sensorineural hearing loss
  • Dental anomalies including dental caries, enamel hypoplasia, and anomalies of tooth number and tooth size and shape
  • A characteristic physical appearance of "cachectic dwarfism" with sunken eyes

CS type I (classic) is suspected:

  • In an older child when both major criteria are present and three minor criteria are present;
  • In an infant or toddler when both major criteria are present, especially if there is increased cutaneous photosensitivity.

CS type II (severe) is suspected:

  • In infants with growth failure at birth and little postnatal increase in height, weight, or head circumference;
  • When there is little or no postnatal neurologic development;
  • When congenital cataracts are present.

CS Type III (mild) is suspected:

  • In children or teenagers with short stature, mild neurologic impairment, and progressive ataxia;
  • Especially but not exclusively when there is cutaneous photosensitivity.

COFS syndrome is suspected when prenatal growth failure and prenatal microcephaly are associated with arthrogryposis and congenital cataracts as well as other structural defects of the eye (microphthalmos, microcornea, iris hypoplasia).

Establishing the Diagnosis

The diagnosis of Cockayne syndrome is established in a proband by identification of biallelic pathogenic variants in ERCC6 or ERCC8 on molecular genetic testing (see Table 1).

Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination of gene-targeted testing (multigene panel) and comprehensive genomic testing (chromosomal microarray analysis, exome sequencing, exome array, genome sequencing) depending on the phenotype.

Gene-targeted testing requires that the clinician determine which gene(s) are likely involved, whereas genomic testing does not. Because the phenotype of Cockayne syndrome is broad, individuals with the distinctive findings described in Suggestive Findings are likely to be diagnosed using gene-targeted testing (see Option 1), whereas those in whom the diagnosis of Cockayne syndrome has not been considered are more likely to be diagnosed using genomic testing (see Option 2).

Option 1

When the phenotypic findings suggest the diagnosis of Cockayne syndrome the recommended molecular genetic testing approach is to use a multigene panel.

A multigene panel that includes ERCC6, ERCC8, and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition at the most reasonable cost while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.

For this disorder a multigene panel that also includes deletion/duplication analysis is recommended (see Table 1).

For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.

Option 2

When the diagnosis of Cockayne syndrome is not considered because an individual has atypical phenotypic features, comprehensive genomic testing (which does not require the clinician to determine which gene[s] are likely involved) is the best option. Exome sequencing is most commonly used; genome sequencing is also possible.

If exome sequencing is not diagnostic, exome array (when clinically available) may be considered to detect (multi)exon deletions or duplications that cannot be detected by sequence analysis.

For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.

Table 1.

Molecular Genetic Testing Used in Cockayne Syndrome

Gene 1, 2Proportion of Cockayne Syndrome Attributed to Pathogenic Variants in GeneProportion of Pathogenic Variants 3 Detectable by Method
Sequence analysis 4Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 5
ERCC6~65%90%610% 6
ERCC8~35%88% 612% 6
1.

Genes are listed in alphabetic order.

2.

See Table A. Genes and Databases for chromosome locus and protein.

3.

See Molecular Genetics for information on allelic variants detected in this gene.

4.

Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include small intragenic deletions/insertions and missense, nonsense, and splice site variants; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.

5.

Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications.

6.

Laugel et al [2010], Calmels et al [2018]

DNA Repair Assay

If the diagnosis of Cockayne syndrome is strongly suspected, but the molecular genetic testing does not identify pathogenic variants in one of the associated genes, an assay of the cellular phenotype can be considered.

Assays of DNA repair are performed on skin fibroblasts. The most consistent findings in CS fibroblasts are marked sensitivity to UV radiation and deficient recovery of RNA synthesis following UV damage (i.e., impaired repair of actively transcribed genes, or "transcription-coupled repair") [Nakazawa et al 2010].

Clinical Characteristics

Clinical Description

Before the molecular genetics of Cockayne syndrome was understood, it was thought to have a single, discrete phenotype: classic Cockayne syndrome. It is now recognized that Cockayne syndrome spans a continuous phenotypic spectrum without clear thresholds, and includes the following [Nance & Berry 1992]:

  • CS type I, the "classic" form
  • CS type II, a more severe form with symptoms present at birth (overlapping with cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome [COFS])
  • CS type III, a milder form
  • Cerebrooculofacioskeletal (COFS) syndrome, the most severe end of the phenotypic spectrum of CS with findings identifiable during fetal life

CS Type I

Presentation. Prenatal growth is typically normal. Birth length, weight, and head circumference are normal. Within the first two years, however, growth and development fall below normal. By the time the disease has become fully manifest, height, weight, and head circumference are far below the fifth percentile.

Progression. Progressive impairment of vision, hearing, and central and peripheral nervous system function leads to severe disability. Brain MRI reveals white matter dysmyelination and progressive cerebral and cerebellar atrophy. Photosensitivity is variable, but individuals are not predisposed to skin cancers.

Additional clinical abnormalities occurring in 10% or more of individuals include the following:

  • Neurologic. Increased tone/spasticity, hyper- or hyporeflexia, stooped standing posture, abnormal gait or inability to walk, ataxia, incontinence, tremor, abnormal or absent speech, seizures, weak cry / poor feeding (as an infant), muscle atrophy, and behavior abnormality
  • Dermatologic. Anhidrosis, malar rash, thin dry hair [Frouin et al 2013]
  • Ophthalmologic. Enophthalmos, pigmentary retinopathy (60%-100%), abnormal electroretinogram, cataracts of various types (15%-36%), optic atrophy, miotic pupils, farsightedness, decreased or absent tears, strabismus, nystagmus, photophobia, narrowed retinal arterioles
  • Hearing. Sensorineural hearing loss
  • Dental. Absent or hypoplastic teeth, enamel hypoplasia, delayed eruption of deciduous teeth, and malocclusion. Enamel anomalies frequently lead to severe dental caries [Bloch-Zupan et al 2013].
  • Skeletal. Radiographic findings of thickened calvarium (due to microcephaly), sclerotic epiphyses, vertebral and pelvic abnormalities
  • Renal. Abnormal renal function, proteinuria, nephrotic syndrome, hyperuricemia, hypertension [Stern-Delfils et al 2020]
  • Endocrine. Undescended testes, delayed/absent sexual maturation, diabetes
  • Gastrointestinal. Elevated liver function tests, enlargement of liver or spleen, gastroesophageal reflux

Death typically occurs in the first or second decade. The mean age of death is 16 years, although survival into the third decade has been reported [Natale 2011].

CS Type II

Children with severe CS have evidence of growth failure at birth, with little or no postnatal neurologic development. Congenital cataracts or other structural anomalies of the eye are present in 30%. Affected individuals may have some contractures of the spine (kyphosis, scoliosis) and joints in neonatal or early postnatal life. Affected children typically die by age five years [Natale 2011]. CS type II partly overlaps with cerebrooculofacioskeletal (COFS) syndrome.

CS Type III

DNA sequencing has confirmed the diagnosis of CS type III in some individuals who have clinical features associated with CS but whose growth and/or cognition exceeds the expectations for CS type I [Natale 2011, Baez et al 2013]. Major features only become apparent after age two years.

COFS Syndrome

COFS syndrome is the most severe subtype of the CS spectrum and can be identified during fetal life. Similarly to individuals with CS type II, individuals with COFS syndrome present with severe prenatal growth failure, severe developmental delay / intellectual disability from birth, axial hypotonia, peripheral hypertonia, and neonatal feeding difficulties. COFS syndrome is additionally defined by the presence of arthrogryposis and usually the combination of extreme congenital microcephaly and congenital cataracts [Laugel et al 2008].

Neuropathology. In all forms of Cockayne syndrome, a characteristic "tigroid" pattern of demyelination in the subcortical white matter of the brain and multifocal calcium deposition, with relative preservation of neurons and without senile plaques, amyloid, ubiquitin, or tau deposition, has been observed together with arteriosclerosis [Weidenheim et al 2009, Hayashi et al 2012].

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

To date no genotype-phenotype correlations for ERCC6 or ERCC8 have been clearly identified.

Nomenclature

The term cerebrooculofacioskeletal (COFS) syndrome and its former synonym, Pena-Shokeir syndrome type II, have been used to refer to a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by congenital neurogenic arthrogryposis (multiple joint contractures), microcephaly, microphthalmia, and cataracts. The original cases of COFS syndrome, described by Pena & Shokeir [1974] among native Canadian families from Manitoba, have since been shown to be homozygous for a pathogenic variant in ERCC6. COFS syndrome is now regarded as an allelic and prenatal form of CS, partly overlapping with CS type II and including the most severe cases of the CS phenotypic spectrum [Laugel et al 2008].

Prevalence

The minimum incidence of CS has been estimated at 2.7 per million births in western Europe; the disease is probably underdiagnosed [Kleijer et al 2008].

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of Cockayne syndrome (CS) depends on the presenting features of the particular individual (see Table 3). Abnormalities that suggest alternative diagnoses include: congenital anomalies of the face, limbs, heart, or viscera; recurrent infections (other than otitis media or respiratory infections); metabolic or neurologic crises; hematologic abnormality (e.g., anemia, leukopenia); and cancer of any kind.

Growth failure is seen in chromosome disorders and endocrine, metabolic, or gastrointestinal disorders, including malnutrition.

Table 3.

Disorders to Consider in the Differential Diagnosis of Cockayne Syndrome

DiffDx DisorderGene(s)MOIClinical Features of Cockayne Syndrome
Also in DiffDx disorderNot in DiffDx disorder
Connatal form of Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease 1PLP1XL
  • Growth failure
  • Hypomyelination
  • Severe growth failure
  • Distinctive physical appearance
Cornelia de Lange syndromeHDAC8
NIPBL
RAD21
SMC1A
SMC3
AD
XL
Profound growth failureDistinctive physical appearance
Dubowitz syndrome (OMIM 223370)??
Hallerman-Streiff syndrome (OMIM 234100)??
Rubinstein-Taybi syndromeCREBBP
EP300
AD
Silver-Russell syndromeSee footnote 2
Seckel syndrome (OMIM PS210600)~9 genes 3AR
Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch syndrome (OMIM 264090)POLR3AAR
Congenital infections (e.g., rubella or toxoplasmosis)N/AN/ACalcifications on brain imaging
  • White matter hypomyelination
  • Distinctive physical appearance
Disorders of calcium & phosphate metabolism
Xeroderma pigmentosum9 genes 4ARProminent photosensitivity &/or thinning of skin & hair
  • White matter hypomyelination
  • Brain calcifications
  • Ataxia
  • Spasticity
  • Neurodegenerative features
Bloom syndromeBLMAR
Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndromeLMNAAD
Werner syndromeWRNAR
Rothmund-Thompson syndromeRECQL4AR
Mitochondrial disordersSee footnote 5AD
AR
Mat
  • Early presence of pigmentary retinopathy
  • Brain calcifications
  • Neurodegeneration
  • Skin photosensitivity
  • Distinctive physical appearance

? = unknown; AD = autosomal dominant; AR = autosomal recessive; COFS = cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome; CS = Cockayne syndrome; DiffDx = differential diagnosis; Mat = maternal; MOI = mode of inheritance; XL = X-linked

1.

Most leukodystrophies are not associated with growth failure, with the possible exception of the connatal form of Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease.

2.

Silver-Russell syndrome has multiple etiologies including: epigenetic changes that modify expression of genes in the imprinted region of chromosome 11p15.5, maternal UPD7, and (infrequently) autosomal dominant or autosomal recessive inheritance.

3.

ATR, CENPJ, CEP152, CEP63, DNA2, NIN, NSMCE2, RBBP8, TRAIP

4.

DDB2, ERCC1, ERCC2, ERCC3, ERCC4, ERCC5, POLH, XPA, XPC

5.

Mitochondrial disorders can be caused by mutation of genes encoded by either nuclear DNA or mitochondrial DNA (see Mitochondrial Disorders Overview).

Warburg micro syndrome (OMIM PS600118), associated with biallelic pathogenic variants in RAB18,RAB3GAP1, RAB3GAP2, or TBC1D20 and presenting with microcephaly, microcornea, and cataracts, may resemble CS type II / COFS syndrome at birth. However; Warburg micro syndrome is not associated with rapidly progressive neurodegeneration and has normal DNA nucleotide excision repair [Graham et al 2004].

Management

Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with Cockayne syndrome (CS), the evaluations summarized in Table 4 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to the diagnosis) are recommended.

Table 4.

Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis in Individuals with Cockayne Syndrome

System/
Concern
EvaluationComment
Growth
  • Measure & plot on standard growth charts.
  • Assessment of feeding
DevelopmentDevelopmental assessment
  • To incl motor, adaptive, cognitive & speech/language eval
  • Eval for early intervention / special education
Neurologic
  • Brain MRI
  • Assessment of muscle tone & for presence of contractures
EyesOphthalmologic evalPossibly incl electroretinogram.
HearingAudiologic evalIncl audiogram.
SkinDermatologic eval
TeethDental eval
SkeletalRadiographs to document skeletal dysplasia if suggestive clinical signs
KidneysLaboratory eval of renal function
LiverLaboratory eval of liver function
OtherConsultation w/clinical geneticist &/or genetic counselor

Treatment of Manifestations

Table 5.

Treatment of Manifestations in Individuals with Cockayne Syndrome

Manifestation/ConcernTreatmentConsiderations/Other
Poor growthFeeding gastrostomy tube placement as neededAvoid rapid ↑ in volume of feeds.
Developmental delay /
Intellectual disability
See Developmental Delay / Intellectual Disability Management Issues in text following the table.
Tremor - spasticity
  • Medication for tremor (carbidopa-levodopa [Neilan et al 2008]) & spasticity (baclofen) if needed
  • Physical therapy to prevent joint contractures
  • Home safety assessments to prevent falls
Abnormal vision and/or cataracts
  • Standard treatment(s) per ophthalmologist
  • Use of sunglasses for lens & retina protection
Hearing loss
  • Hearing aids may be helpful; per otolaryngologist.
  • Cochlear implants may be used [Van Wyhe et al 2018].
Dental cariesAggressive dental care to minimize caries
Cutaneous photosensitivityUse of sunscreens; limitation of sun exposure
HypertensionAmlodipine, ACE inhibitor