Char Syndrome

Watchlist
Retrieved
2021-01-18
Source
Trials
Genes
Drugs

Summary

Clinical characteristics.

Char syndrome is characterized by the triad of typical facial features, patent ductus arteriosus, and aplasia or hypoplasia of the middle phalanges of the fifth fingers. Typical facial features are depressed nasal bridge and broad flat nasal tip, widely spaced eyes, downslanted palpebral fissures, mild ptosis, short philtrum with prominent philtral ridges with an upward pointing vermilion border resulting in a triangular mouth, and thickened (patulous) everted lips. Less common findings include other types of congenital heart defects, other hand and foot anomalies, hypodontia, hearing loss, myopia and/or strabismus, polythelia, parasomnia, craniosynostosis (involving either the metopic or sagittal suture), and short stature.

Diagnosis/testing.

The diagnosis of Char syndrome is established in a proband with suggestive clinical findings and/or a heterozygous pathogenic variant in TFAP2B identified by molecular genetic testing.

Management.

Treatment of manifestations: Management of patent ductus arteriosus after the immediate newborn period is determined by the degree of shunting from the aorta to the pulmonary artery; options are surgical ligation or ductal occlusion at catheterization. Hypodontia/tooth anomalies, vision problems, hearing loss, other hand/foot anomalies, parasomnias, and craniosynostosis are treated in a routine manner.

Surveillance: Assessment for signs and symptoms of sleep problems at each visit; monitoring of head shape and size at each visit during the first year of life; vision and hearing screening annually or as clinically indicated; dental evaluations every six months starting at age three years.

Genetic counseling.

Char syndrome is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. The proportion of cases caused by a de novo pathogenic variant is unknown. If a parent of the proband is affected, the risk to the sibs is 50%. When the parents are clinically unaffected, the risk to the sibs of a proband appears to be low. Each child of an individual with Char syndrome has a 50% chance of inheriting the pathogenic variant and having the disorder. If the pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, prenatal testing for a pregnancy at increased risk and preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Diagnosis

Formal clinical diagnostic criteria for Char syndrome have not been published.

Suggestive Findings

Char syndrome should be suspected in individuals with the following clinical and family history findings.

Clinical features

  • Typical facial features with depressed nasal bridge and broad flat nasal tip, widely spaced eyes, downslanted palpebral fissures, mild ptosis, short philtrum with prominent philtral ridges with an upward pointing vermilion border resulting in a triangular mouth, and thickened (patulous) everted lips
  • Patent ductus arteriosus
  • Aplasia or hypoplasia of the middle phalanges of the fifth fingers

Family history consistent with autosomal dominant inheritance (e.g., affected males and females in multiple generations). Absence of a known family history does not preclude the diagnosis.

Establishing the Diagnosis

The diagnosis of Char syndrome is established in a proband with suggestive clinical findings and/or a heterozygous pathogenic variant in TFAP2B identified by molecular genetic testing (see Table 1).

Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination of gene-targeted testing (single-gene testing, multigene panel) and comprehensive genomic testing (exome sequencing, genome sequencing) depending on the phenotype.

Gene-targeted testing requires that the clinician determine which gene(s) are likely involved, whereas genomic testing does not. Because the phenotype of Char syndrome is broad, individuals with the distinctive findings described in Suggestive Findings are likely to be diagnosed using gene-targeted testing (see Option 1), whereas those in whom the diagnosis of Char syndrome has not been considered are more likely to be diagnosed using genomic testing (see Option 2).

Option 1

When the phenotypic and laboratory findings suggest the diagnosis of Char syndrome, molecular genetic testing approaches can include single-gene testing or use of a multigene panel:

  • Single-gene testing. Sequence analysis of TFAP2B detects small intragenic deletions/insertions and missense, nonsense, and splice site variants; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected.
  • A multigene panel that includes TFAP2B and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition at the most reasonable cost while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.
    For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.

Option 2

When the diagnosis of Char syndrome is not considered because an individual has atypical phenotypic features, comprehensive genomic testing (which does not require the clinician to determine which gene[s] are likely involved) is the best option. Exome sequencing is the most commonly used genomic testing method; genome sequencing is also possible.

For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.

Table 1.

Molecular Genetic Testing Used in Char Syndrome

Gene 1MethodProportion of Probands with a Pathogenic Variant 2 Detectable by Method
TFAP2BSequence analysis 315/15 probands 4
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 5None reported 6
UnknownNA
1.

See Table A. Genes and Databases for chromosome locus and protein.

2.

See Molecular Genetics for information on allelic variants detected in this gene.

3.

Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Pathogenic variants may include small intragenic deletions/insertions and missense, nonsense, and splice site variants; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.

4.

Satoda & Gelb [2003]

5.

Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications.

6.

Because most of the pathogenic variants identified to date result in mutated protein with dominant-negative effects, it is likely that variants will be missense defects in the coding region for critical domains, particularly the basic domain. Rare pathogenic changes altering splice sites & engendering haploinsufficiency have also been reported [Mani et al 2005, Massaad et al 2019].

Clinical Characteristics

Clinical Description

Char syndrome is characterized by the triad of typical facial features (see Figure 1), patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), and stereotypic hand anomalies (see Diagnosis).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Typical facial features in a woman with Char syndrome Reprinted with permission from Satoda et al [1999]

Table 2.

Features of Char Syndrome

Feature% of Persons
with Feature
Comment
Facial
dysmorphia
86%Higher prevalence in those w/missense variants (98%) vs loss-of-function variants (59%) (See Genotype-Phenotype Correlations.)
PDA68%
Other congenital
heart defects
6%
Hand anomalies57%Higher prevalence in those w/missense variants altering the basic domain (residues 223-301; 79%) than in the transactivation domain (residues 65-86; 0%) (See Genotype-Phenotype Correlations.)

PDA. The ductus arteriosus, the fetal arterial connection between the aorta and pulmonary artery that shunts blood away from the lungs, constricts shortly after birth. If the ductus arteriosus remains patent, left to right shunting (from the systemic circulation into the pulmonary circulation) occurs, resulting in pulmonary hypertension if not corrected. No information is available concerning the likelihood of spontaneous closure of a PDA after the first weeks of life in individuals with Char syndrome, but it is likely to be rather low.

Less common features associated with Char syndrome:

  • Other heart defects (e.g., muscular ventricular septal defects, complex congenital defects)
  • Other hand abnormalities including interstitial polydactyly [Slavotinek et al 1997], distal symphalangism of the fifth fingers (fusion of distal interphalangeal joints), and hypoplasia of the third fingers [Babaoğlu et al 2012]
  • Foot anomalies including interphalangeal joint fusion or clinodactyly [Sweeney et al 2000], interstitial polydactyly [Slavotinek et al 1997], and syndactyly [Slavotinek et al 1997]
  • Hypodontia. Lack of second and/or third molars in all four quadrants [Mani et al 2005; Author, unpublished observation]
  • Visual impairment. Myopia [Bertola et al 2000], strabismus [Bertola et al 2000, Sweeney et al 2000]
  • Hearing abnormalities including profound bilateral hearing loss in two affected individuals [Edward et al 2019; Author, unpublished observation in a member of the enlarged version of the original family studied by Char]
  • Polythelia (supernumerary nipples) [Zannolli et al 2000]
  • Parasomnia [Mani et al 2005]
  • Craniosynostosis involving either the metopic or sagittal suture reported in four affected individuals [Timberlake et al 2019]
  • Short stature (≤3 SD below the mean) reported in two affected individuals [Massaad et al 2019, Timberlake et al 2019]

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

Among the 16 different pathogenic variants in TFAP2B described in publications, seven are loss-of-function alleles and nine are missense changes. For the latter, eight of the nine alter residues in the DNA binding domain (basic domain; residues 223-301) and one is in the transactivation domain (residues 65-86).

  • Individuals harboring basic domain alleles tend to have the classic form of Char syndrome (97% with facial features, 58% with PDA, and 79% with hand anomalies) [Satoda et al 1999, Satoda et al 2000, Zhao et al 2001].
  • For individuals in the one family inheriting the transactivation domain-altering variant, the facial features were prevalent (14/14) but mild, PDA was generally present (10/14), but hand anomalies were not observed in any [Zhao et al 2001].
  • The phenotypes associated with loss-of-function pathogenic variants often included PDA (32/40; 80%) but facial features of Char syndrome were less prevalent (23/39; 59%); features in these individuals not observed in those with missense variants included craniosynostosis (n = 3) and short stature (n = 2) [Massaad et al 2019, Timberlake et al 2019].

Penetrance

The penetrance of Char syndrome has not been formally determined. Two asymptomatic individuals with TFAP2B pathogenic variants have been described [Mani et al 2005, Timberlake et al 2019].

Prevalence

The prevalence of Char syndrome has not been determined but is thought to be quite low.

Differential Diagnosis

Facial features. The typical facial features associated with Char syndrome are usually striking and not often confused with facial features observed in other disorders. The facial profile is similar to that of maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder syndrome; OMIM 155050).

Hand anomalies. The hand anomalies associated with Char syndrome can be as minimal as fifth finger clinodactyly, which can be a normal finding and overlaps with numerous other syndromes.

Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) constitutes about 10% of all congenital heart disease.

Isolated PDA (in the absence of other congenital heart defects) occurs in about one in 2,000 full-term infants. PDA is considerably more common in premature infants. It is one of the cardiac lesions observed in congenital rubella syndrome and may occur in autosomal dominant and recessive disorders that are nonsyndromic [Mani et al 2002].

Note: Screening of a group of individuals with isolated PDA rarely revealed the presence of TFAP2B pathogenic variants [Khetyar et al 2008, Chen et al 2011].

Heart-hand syndromes. See Table 3.

Table 3.

Genes Associated with Heart-Hand Syndromes in the Differential Diagnosis of Char Syndrome

Gene(s)DisorderMOICongenital Heart DefectsHand AbnormalitiesOther Clinical Characteristics
CREBBP
EP300
Rubinstein-Taybi syndromeADPresent in ~1/3 of affected persons; CHDs incl ASD, VSD, PDA, CoA.Broad & often angulated thumbs & hallucesDistinctive facial features, short stature, & moderate-to-severe ID
DVL1
DVL3
WNT5A
Autosomal dominant Robinow syndromeADPresent in <25% of affected persons; CHDs incl pulmonary valve stenosis/atresia, ASD, VSD, & CoA.BrachydactylySkeletal dysplasia; short stature; dysmorphic facial features resembling a fetal face
EVC
EVC2
Ellis-van Creveld syndrome (OMIM 225500)ARPresent in 50-60% of affected persons; CHDs incl common atrium, mitral & tricuspid valve defects, PDA, VSD, & hypoplastic left heart syndrome.Postaxial polydactylyShort stature w/shortening of the long bones; hidrotic ectodermal dysplasia of the nails, hair, & teeth
GPC3
GPC4
Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome type 1XL
  • CHDs variable; septal defects common
  • Pulmonic stenosis, CoA, transposition of the great vessels, & PDA or patent foramen ovale reported
Hand anomalies incl large hands & postaxial polydactyly.Pre- & postnatal macrosomia; distinctive facies; variable visceral, skeletal, & neurodevelopmental abnormalities
RBM8AThrombocytopenia-absent radius syndromeARPresent in 15%-22% of affected persons (usually septal defects rather than complex cardiac malformations)Thumbs of near-normal size but somewhat wider & flatter than usual; they are also held in flexion against the palm, & tend to have limited function.Bilateral absence of the radii & thrombocytopenia (<50 platelets/nL) that is generally transient
ROR2ROR2 Robinow syndromeAR
  • Present in 15% of affected persons
  • CHDs include pulmonary valve stenosis/ atresia, ASD, VSD, CoA, tetralogy of Fallot, & tricuspid atresia
  • CHDs are the major cause of early death.
  • Phalanges & carpal bones may be fused.
  • Partial cutaneous syndactyly or ectrodactyly (i.e., split hand) may be seen.
Face in early childhood resembling a fetal face at 8 wks' gestation; skeletal abnormalities; short stature
TBX3Ulnar-mammary syndrome (OMIM 181450)ADVSDPostaxial polydactyly; camptodactyly, missing digitsHypoplastic or missing ulnae; hypoplasia of the apocrine & mammary glands; facial dysmorphia
TBX5Holt-Oram syndromeADPresent in 75% of affected persons; CHDs most commonly involving the septumUpper-limb malformations may be unilateral, bilateral/symmetric, or bilateral/asymmetric & range from triphalangeal or absent thumb(s) to phocomelia.Cardiac conduction disease

AD = autosomal dominant; AR = autosomal recessive; ASD = atrial septal defect; CHD = congenital heart disease; CoA = coarctation of the aorta; ID = intellectual disability; MOI = mode of inheritance; PDA = patent ductus arteriosus; VSD = ventricular septal defect; XL = X-linked

Heart-hand disorders of unknown genetic etiology to consider:

  • PDA and bicuspid aortic valve with hand anomalies (fifth metacarpal hypoplasia and brachydactyly), but normal facies (OMIM 604381). This disorder is genetically distinct from Char syndrome, documented using linkage exclusion for the TFAP2B locus.
  • Tabatznik syndrome [Silengo et al 1990]
  • Heart-hand syndrome type III (OMIM 140450)

Management

Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with Char syndrome, the evaluations summarized in Table 4 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to the diagnosis) are recommended.

Table 4.

Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis in Individuals with Char Syndrome

System/ConcernEvaluationComment
DentalDental eval after age 3 yrsTo assess for hypodontia & other tooth anomalies
EyesOphthalmology evalTo assess for strabismus & refractive error
HearingAudiology evalTo assess for hearing loss
CardiovascularCardiac eval, usually incl echocardiogramTo screen for PDA &/or other cardiac anomalies 1
MusculoskeletalPhysical exam for polydactyly, symphalangism, & syndactylyHand &/or foot radiographs may be considered.
SleepAssessment for sleep disorders incl abnormal movements during sleep
CraniofacialAssessment of head shape & sizeImaging may be needed if craniosynostosis suspected.
Miscellaneous/
Other
Consultation w/clinical geneticist &/or genetic counselorTo incl genetic counseling
Family support/resourcesUse of community or online resources such as Parent to Parent

PDA = patent ductus arteriosus

1.

Evaluation in the newborn nursery may not be completely informative, as the ductus arteriosus may remain open for several days in any neonate.

Treatment of Manifestations

The most striking external aspects of Char syndrome, namely the dysmorphia and hand anomalies, require no special care early in life. The dysmorphic features do become important as affected individuals go through childhood and adolescence because of their stigmatizing effects. No data on the success of plastic surgical intervention for the facial features in Char syndrome are available.

Table 5.

Treatment of Manifestations in Individuals with Char Syndrome

Manifestation/ConcernTreatmentConsiderations/Other
Hypodontia / Tooth
anomalies
Standard treatment per orthodontist
Strabismus /
Refractive error
Standard treatment per ophthalmologist
Hearing lossHearing aids may be helpful as per otolaryngologistCommunity hearing services through early intervention or school district
PDA / Congenital
heart defects
Management of PDA after immediate newborn period determined by degree of shunting from aorta to pulmonary arterySurgical ligation or ductal occlusion at catheterization are treatment options.
Polydactyly, symphalangism,
&/or syndactyly
Standard treatment per orthopedist
ParasomniasStandard treatment through a sleep disorders clinic
CraniosynostosisStandard treatment through plastic surgery

PDA = patent ductus arteriosus

Surveillance

Children with Char syndrome need pediatric attention during infancy and childhood.

Table 6.

Recommended Surveillance for Individuals with Char Syndrome

System/ConcernEvaluationFrequency
DentalDental evalEvery 6 mos starting at age 3 yrs
EyesVision screeningAnnually or as clinically indicated in childhood
HearingAudiology evalAnnually or as clinically indicated in childhood
SleepAssessment for signs & symptoms of sleep disorderAt each visit
CraniofacialMonitor head shape & size in infancy.At each visit during 1st yr of life

Evaluation of Relatives at Risk

See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.

Therapies Under Investigation

Search ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder.