Apc-Associated Polyposis Conditions

Watchlist
Retrieved
2021-01-18
Source
Trials
Genes
Drugs

Summary

Clinical characteristics.

APC-associated polyposis conditions include: familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), attenuated FAP, and gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS).

  • FAP is a colon cancer predisposition syndrome in which hundreds to thousands of adenomatous colonic polyps develop, beginning, on average, at age 16 years (range 7-36 years). By age 35 years, 95% of individuals with FAP have polyps; without colectomy, colon cancer is inevitable. The mean age of colon cancer diagnosis in untreated individuals is 39 years (range 34-43 years). Extracolonic manifestations are variably present and include: polyps of the gastric fundus and duodenum, osteomas, dental anomalies, congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPE), soft tissue tumors, desmoid tumors, and associated cancers.
  • Attenuated FAP is characterized by multiple colonic polyps (average of 30), more proximally located polyps, and a diagnosis of colon cancer at a later age than in FAP. Certain extracolonic manifestations, such as gastric and duodenal polyps or cancers, are variably present in attenuated FAP; risk management may be substantially different between FAP and attenuated FAP.
  • GAPPS is characterized by gastric fundic gland polyposis, increased risk of gastric cancer, and limited colonic involvement in most individuals reported.

Diagnosis/testing.

The diagnosis of an APC-associated polyposis condition is now established by molecular genetic testing. Typically, it is suspected in an individual with suggestive personal and/or family history features and confirmed by identification of a heterozygous germline pathogenic variant in APC.

Management.

Treatment of manifestations: There is an absolute indication for colectomy when colorectal cancer is diagnosed or suspected, or when there are significant symptoms (bleeding/obstruction). Relative indications for colectomy include presence of multiple adenomas larger than 6 mm that cannot be reasonably removed endoscopically, a significant increase in adenoma number between surveillance exams, presence of adenomas with high-grade dysplasia, or inability to adequately survey the colon (e.g., due to innumerous diminutive adenomas or limited access to/compliance with colonoscopy). Several studies have shown that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have caused regression of adenomas in FAP and decreased the polyp burden, though there are currently no FDA-approved chemopreventive agents for FAP. Endoscopic or surgical removal of duodenal adenomas is considered if polyps exhibit villous change or severe dysplasia, exceed one centimeter in diameter, or cause symptoms. Osteomas may be removed for cosmetic reasons. Desmoid tumors may be surgically excised or treated with NSAIDs, anti-estrogens, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and/or radiation.

Surveillance: Colorectal screening beginning at age ten to 12 years for FAP and in late teens for attenuated FAP; esophagogastroduodenoscopy by age 20-30 years or prior to colon surgery; regular physical examinations including thyroid palpation, neurologic examination, and abdominal examination (for desmoids); consider annual thyroid ultrasound imaging for increased risk of thyroid cancer. Consider screening for hepatoblastoma by liver ultrasound and measurement of serum alpha-fetoprotein concentration (until age 5 years). The efficacy of screening for gastric cancer or prophylactic gastrectomy is currently unknown for individuals with GAPPS.

Evaluation of relatives at risk: Molecular genetic testing for early identification of at-risk family members improves diagnostic certainty and reduces the need for costly screening procedures in those at-risk family members who have not inherited the pathogenic variant.

Genetic counseling.

APC-associated polyposis conditions are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. Approximately 75%-80% of individuals with an APC-associated polyposis condition have an affected parent. Offspring of an affected individual are at a 50% risk of inheriting the pathogenic variant in APC. Prenatal testing and preimplantation genetic diagnosis are possible if a pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member.

Diagnosis

Suggestive Findings

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has published an algorithm for consideration of the diagnosis of both FAP and attenuated FAP [Provenzale et al 2016]. These guidelines include recommendations for genetic testing of APC. Consensus guidelines specific for GAPPS are not yet available.

According to the NCCN guidelines, an APC-associated polyposis condition should be suspected in individuals with any of the following clinical features:

  • Multiple colorectal adenomatous polyps (at least 10-20 cumulative colorectal adenomatous polyps)
  • Family history of multiple colorectal adenomatous polyps (>10 in a single individual, or fewer if >1 relative has multiple polyps, especially if diagnosed at a young age) and/or extracolonic features mentioned below. The total number of polyps, age of onset, number of affected relatives, and presence or absence of extracolonic findings may influence if referral for genetic counseling and/or testing is necessary based on family history.
  • Hepatoblastoma
  • Multifocal/bilateral congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPE)
  • Desmoid tumor
  • Cribriform-morular variant of papillary thyroid cancer

Additional features suggestive of an APC-associated polyposis condition. The presence of the following additional features may influence the decision to offer APC genetic testing: early-onset colorectal cancer with few to no adenomatous polyps, dental abnormalities (e.g., supernumerary teeth), osteomas, odontomas, epidermoid cysts, duodenal adenomas and cancer, gastric fundic gland polyposis, gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, small bowel carcinoma, and/or medulloblastoma.

Establishing the Diagnosis

The diagnosis of an APC-associated polyposis condition is typically considered in an individual with characteristic clinical findings and is established by identification of a heterozygous germline pathogenic variant in APC (see Table 1).

Note: A variety of terms have been used to describe individuals with an APC-associated polyposis condition; FAP, attenuated FAP, Gardner syndrome, Turcot syndrome, or the recently described gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS). The clinical features associated with these phenotypes are included here; however, all are now genetically defined as caused by pathogenic variants in APC. Terms such as Gardner syndrome and Turcot syndrome are of historical interest and should not be used any longer as both are now known to be part of the FAP spectrum. GAPPS was only recently described and the current phenotype is not yet well understood. Management guidelines differ between FAP and attenuated FAP. A consensus has not been reached regarding the precise clinical diagnostic criteria that distinguish FAP from attenuated FAP.

The diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is considered in an individual with a heterozygous germline pathogenic variant in APC by molecular genetic testing (see Table 1) and ONE of the following:

  • At least 100 colorectal adenomatous polyps (individuals at younger ages or those with colectomies may have fewer than 100 colorectal adenomatous polyps).
    Note: (1) The presence of 100 or more colorectal polyps is not specific to FAP; genetic testing of APC may help distinguish FAP from other colonic polyposis conditions (see Differential Diagnosis).
  • Multiple but fewer than 100 adenomatous polyps and a relative with confirmed FAP

The diagnosis of attenuated FAP is considered in an individual with a heterozygous germline pathogenic variant in APC by molecular genetic testing (see Table 1) and:

  • A relative with confirmed attenuated FAP; AND/OR
  • Fewer than 100 colorectal adenomatous polyps; OR
  • More than 100 colorectal adenomatous polyps at an advanced age (>40 years).

The diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS) is considered in an individual with the following [Worthley et al 2012]:

  • Gastric polyps restricted to the body and fundus
  • More than 100 polyps in the proximal stomach or more than 30 polyps in a first-degree relative of an individual with GAPPS
  • Predominantly fundic gland polyps (FGPs); some having regions of dysplasia (or a family member with either dysplastic FGPs or gastric adenocarcinoma).
  • An autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance
  • No evidence of colorectal or duodenal polyposis

Note: (1) Other causes of gastric polyposis should be excluded, including proton pump inhibitor use (repeat endoscopy off therapy should be performed in individuals on proton pump inhibitors) and other heritable causes. (2) The above diagnostic criteria were originally proposed prior to the identification of disease-associated variants in promoter 1B of APC as the cause of GAPPS. Given this new information, disease-associated variants in promoter 1B of APC should be included in the diagnostic criteria for GAPPS, but these diagnostic criteria are rapidly evolving as more information becomes available. For example, colonic polyposis has now been seen in a select number of individuals reported to have GAPPS [Li et al 2016]

Molecular Testing

Molecular testing approaches can include single-gene testing and use of a multigene panel:

  • Single-gene testing. Testing should include both sequencing and deletion/duplication analyses of APC. Deletion/duplication testing should also include analysis of the regulatory regions (specifically promoter 1B) of APC if an APC pathogenic variant is not identified with initial testing.
  • A multigene panel that includes APC and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) may also be considered. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview; thus, clinicians need to determine which multigene panel is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition at the most reasonable cost while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.
    For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.

Table 1.

Molecular Genetic Testing Used in APC-Associated Polyposis Conditions

Gene 1MethodProportion of Probands with a Pathogenic Variant 2 Detectable by Method 3
APCSequence analysis 4≤90% 5
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 6~8%-12% 7
1.

See Table A. Genes and Databases for chromosome locus and protein.

2.

See Molecular Genetics for information on allelic variants detected in this gene.

3.

The likelihood of detecting an APC pathogenic variant is highly dependent on the severity of colonic polyposis and on the family history. Detection rates are higher in classic polyposis than in attenuated colonic phenotypes [Sieber et al 2002, Aretz et al 2005, Michils et al 2005, Aretz et al 2006] and higher in individuals with a family history of polyposis than in those without affected family members in the previous generation [Truta et al 2005, Aretz et al 2007, Hes et al 2008]. Fewer than 30% of individuals with attenuated phenotypes are expected to have an identifiable APC pathogenic variant [Lefevre et al 2006].

4.

Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Pathogenic variants may include small intragenic deletions/insertions and missense, nonsense, and splice site variants; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.

5.

Approximately 20% of individuals with an apparent de novo APC pathogenic variant (i.e. no family history of an affected individual) have somatic mosaicism [Hes et al 2008]. In individuals with somatic mosaicism, sequencing of APC in DNA extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes may fail to detect pathogenic variants because of weak mutation signals [Aretz et al 2007, Hes et al 2008]. This may explain (in part) the lower pathogenic variant detection rate in simplex cases (i.e., a single occurrence in a family) than in persons with an affected parent.

6.

Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications. Large deletion/duplication testing should also include analysis of the regulatory regions (specifically promoter 1B) of APC [Rohlin et al 2011].

7.

Approximately 8%-12% of individuals with an APC-associated polyposis condition and 100 or more polyps have a partial or whole APC deletion [Sieber et al 2002, Bunyan et al 2004, Aretz et al 2005, Michils et al 2005]. In one study, 19 (6%) of 296 individuals with ten or more adenomatous polyps who had no pathogenic variants in MUTYH (see Differential Diagnosis) or APC using sequencing, protein truncation testing, and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (a type of variant scanning) had a large APC deletion detected by MLPA [Nielsen et al 2007b].

Clinical Characteristics

Clinical Description

APC-associated polyposis conditions include familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), attenuated FAP, and gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS).

Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP)

In individuals with FAP, colorectal adenomatous polyps begin to appear in the second and third decade; the average age of polyp diagnosis is 16 years (range 7-36 years) [Petersen et al 1991]. By age 35 years, 95% of individuals with FAP have polyps. Once they appear, the polyps rapidly increase in number; when colonic expression is fully developed hundreds to thousands of colonic adenomatous polyps are typically observed. Without colectomy, colon cancer is essentially inevitable. The average age of colon cancer diagnosis in untreated individuals is 39 years (range 34-43 years). Seven percent of untreated individuals with FAP develop colon cancer by age 21 years, 87% by 45 years, and 93% by 50 years [Bussey 1975]. Although rare, asymptomatic individuals in their 50s have been reported [Evans et al 1993]. Inter- and intrafamilial phenotypic variability are common [Giardiello et al 1994, Rozen et al 1999].

Other Features Variably Present in FAP

Table 2.

Lifetime Risk for Extracolonic Cancer in FAP

SiteType of CancerLifetime Risk for Cancer
Small bowel: duodenum or periampullaCarcinoma4%-12%
Small bowel: distal to the duodenumCarcinomaRare
PancreasAdenocarcinoma~1%
ThyroidPapillary thyroid carcinoma1%-12%
CNSUsually medulloblastoma<1%
LiverHepatoblastoma1.6%
Bile ductsAdenocarcinomaLow, but increased
StomachAdenocarcinoma<1% in Western cultures

Small-bowel polyps and cancer. Adenomatous polyps of the duodenum, observed in 50%-90% of individuals with FAP, are commonly found in the second and third portions of the duodenum [Kadmon et al 2001] and less frequently in the distal small bowel [Wallace & Phillips 1998]. A classification system for duodenal polyps, based on number and size of polyps, histology, and degree of dysplasia, has been developed [Spigelman et al 1989]. No clear association between the number of colonic polyps and the number of upper gastrointestinal polyps has been identified [Kadmon et al 2001].

Adenomatous polyps of the periampullary region (including the duodenal papilla and ampulla of Vater) are seen in at least 50% of individuals with FAP. Polyps in this area can cause obstruction of the pancreatic duct resulting in pancreatitis or biliary obstruction, both of which occur at increased frequency in FAP. These polyps are often small and require a side-viewing endoscope for visualization. Some theorize that pancreaticobiliary secretions (e.g., bile) affect the development of adenomas [Wallace & Phillips 1998], and may account for the observed increased risk for malignancy of polyps in the periampullary region [Kadmon et al 2001].

The lifetime risk for small bowel malignancy is 4%-12% with the large majority occurring in the duodenum. Duodenal adenocarcinoma occurs most commonly in the periampullary area. It has been reported to occur between ages 17 and 81 years, with the mean age of diagnosis between 45 and 52 years [Wallace & Phillips 1998, Kadmon et al 2001]. Small-bowel cancer distal to the duodenum occurs but is rare. Ruys et al [2010] identified only 17 cases of jejunal carcinoma and three cases of ileal carcinoma in individuals with FAP reported in the literature [Ruys et al 2010].

Pancreatic cancer. Although limited data exist, one study of 197 families with FAP revealed a relative risk for pancreatic cancer of 4.5 in individuals with FAP and their at-risk relatives compared to the general population risk. The lifetime pancreatic cancer risk to age 80 in individuals with FAP was estimated at 1% [Giardiello et al 1993b].

Thyroid cancer and benign thyroid disease. A high degree of variability in the frequency of thyroid cancer is reported in individuals with FAP. Various retrospective reviews have reported a prevalence of 0.4% to 2%, whereas prospective studies have found a higher prevalence of 2.6% to 11.8% [Cetta 2015]. There is a striking female-to-male ratio of 80 to 1 in FAP and greater than 80% of individuals are diagnosed between the ages of 18 to 35 years [Cetta 2015]. Papillary histology predominates and may have a cribriform pattern [Jarrar et al 2011, Steinhagen et al 2012]. A rare subtype of papillary thyroid carcinoma, called cribriform-morular variant, is typically associated with FAP [Pradhan et al 2015]. Although it occurs in sporadic cancers, this variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma is an indication for germline APC molecular testing [NCCN 2016].

Data on the rate of benign thyroid disease in individuals with FAP are limited. In one retrospective study, 9.1% of individuals with FAP had benign thyroid disease (hypothyroidism, cysts, goiter, and/or thyroiditis) [Steinhagen et al 2012], whereas a prospective screening study found that 38% had benign thyroid nodules [Jarrar et al 2011]. Differences in sample size and study design (retrospective compared to prospective screening studies) likely contribute to the discrepancies in the rate of thyroid disease reported among studies. Familial occurrence and a female preponderance have been observed.

CNS. The CNS tumors in individuals with APC pathogenic variants are typically medulloblastoma. The risk for CNS tumors is substantially increased in persons with FAP, although the absolute risk is only approximately 1%. Historically, the combination of colonic polyposis and CNS tumors was included in the designation Turcot syndrome, but this distinction is no longer clinically useful.

Hepatoblastoma. The risk for hepatoblastoma in FAP is 750 to 7500 times higher than in the general population, although the absolute risk is estimated at less than 2% [Aretz et al 2007]. The majority of hepatoblastomas occur prior to age three years [Aretz et al 2007].

Gastric polyps and cancer. The risk for both fundic gland and adenomatous polyps of the stomach is increased in FAP [Bülow et al 1995]:

  • Gastric fundic gland polyps (FGPs) are benign neoplasms located in the fundus and body of the stomach; some authors classify them as hamartomatous, but this classification is under debate. FGPs occur in approximately half of individuals with FAP [Offerhaus et al 1999] and undergo dysplastic change more commonly than sporadic FGPs [Bianchi et al 2008]. For a complete review of gastric FGPs and their relationship to FAP and attenuated FAP, see Burt [2003].
  • Adenomatous polyps, the second most prevalent gastric lesion in individuals with FAP [Bülow et al 1995, Wallace & Phillips 1998], are usually confined to the gastric antrum [Offerhaus et al 1999].

The risk for gastric cancer in individuals with FAP living in Western cultures is low, although it has been reported [Offerhaus et al 1999, Garrean et al 2008]. The rates of gastric cancer in persons of Japanese and Korean heritage with FAP may be tenfold higher than the general population [Garrean et al 2008]. Gastric adenocarcinoma is believed to arise most often from adenomas but may also develop from fundic gland polyps [Zwick et al 1997, Hofgärtner et al 1999, Attard et al 2001].

Non-Malignant Extraintestinal Manifestations of FAP

Historically, the combination of colonic polyposis and prominent extraintestinal manifestations such as osteomas, dental abnormalities, and benign cutaneous lesions was termed Gardner’s syndrome in honor of Eldin Gardner, who originally described the association [Gardner 1951]. It is now clear that these families have a pathogenic variant in APC and should be classified as having FAP.

Osteomas occur in about 20% of individuals with FAP. They are bony growths found most commonly on the skull and mandible; however, they may occur in any bone of the body. Osteomas do not usually cause clinical problems and do not become malignant; they may appear in children prior to the development of colonic polyps.

Dental abnormalities. Unerupted teeth, congenital absence of one or more teeth, supernumerary teeth, dentigerous cysts (an odontogenic cyst associated with the crown of an unerupted tooth), and odontomas have been reported in approximately 17% of individuals with FAP compared to 1%-2% of the general population [Brett et al 1994].

Congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPE) refers to discrete, flat, pigmented lesions of the retina that are not age dependent and do not cause clinical problems. CHRPE is reported to occur in up to 75% of individuals with FAP. Visualization of CHRPE may require examination of the ocular fundus with an indirect ophthalmoscope through a dilated pupil. Observation of multiple or bilateral CHRPE may be an indication that an at-risk family member has inherited FAP, whereas isolated lesions can be seen in the general population [Chen et al 2006].

Benign cutaneous lesions include epidermoid cysts and fibromas that may be found on any part of the body, including the face. They are mainly of cosmetic concern, as they do not appear to have malignant potential. Multiple pilomatricomas (benign tumors of the hair follicles), although rare, have also been reported [Pujol et al 1995].

Desmoid tumors develop in approximately 10%-30% of individuals with FAP [Nieuwenhuis et al 2011b, Sinha et al 2011]. The risk for desmoid tumors in individuals with FAP is more than 800 times the risk in the general population [Nieuwenhuis et al 2011a]. At least 7.5% of desmoid type fibromatoses are found in people with FAP [Nieuwenhuis et al 2011a]. These poorly understood, benign fibrous tumors are clonal proliferations of myofibroblasts that are locally invasive but do not metastasize [Clark et al 1999]. A pathologically distinct fibromatous lesion called a Gardner-associated fibroma (GAF) is hypothesized to be a precursor lesion [Wehrli et al 2001].

The incidence of desmoid tumors in FAP is highest in the second and third decades of life, with 80% occurring by age 40 years [Sinha et al 2011]. Approximately 65% of desmoid tumors in individuals with FAP occur within the abdomen or in the abdominal wall [Sinha et al 2011]. Desmoid tumors may compress abdominal organs or complicate abdominal surgery. About 5% of individuals with FAP experience morbidity and/or mortality from desmoid tumors, with the highest mortality rate reported for intra-abdominal tumors [Sinha et al 2011]. Abdominal desmoid tumors may occur spontaneously or following abdominal surgery [Bertario et al 2001]. The effect of pregnancy on desmoid tumor growth or development is unknown [Sinha et al 2011]. Independent predictors for desmoid tumor development include: an APC pathogenic variant 3' of codon 1399, family history of desmoid tumors, female gender, and previous abdominal surgery [Sinha et al 2011]. Positive family history of desmoid tumor was associated with the highest magnitude of risk; having a first-degree relative with a desmoid tumor was associated with a seven-fold increase in risk [Sinha et al 2011].

Desmoid tumors are best evaluated by CT scan [Clark & Phillips 1996] or MRI. A CT scoring system for desmoid tumors in FAP has been developed [Middleton et al 2003].

Adrenal masses are reportedly two to four times more prevalent in FAP than in the general population [Rekik et al 2010]. Adrenal masses are found in 1%-3% of the general population; a retrospective analysis identified adrenal masses in 7.4% of individuals with FAP [Marchesa et al 1997], and a prospective study of 107 individuals with FAP found 13% with an adrenal mass ≥1.0 cm on abdominal CT scan [Smith et al 2000b]. Most of the masses are asymptomatic adenomas found incidentally, although functional lesions and carcinomas do occur [Marchesa et al 1997, Rekik et al 2010].

Attenuated FAP

Attenuated FAP is characterized by fewer colonic polyps (average of 30) than classic FAP but a significant risk for colorectal cancer. Polyps tend to be found more proximally in the colon than in classic FAP.

The cumulative risk for colorectal cancer by age 80 years in attenuated FAP is estimated at 70% [Neklason et al 2008]. The average age of colon cancer diagnosis in individuals with attenuated FAP is 50 to 55 years – ten to 15 years later than in those with FAP, but earlier than in those with sporadically occurring colon cancer [Spirio et al 1993, Giardiello et al 1997].

In two large kindreds with attenuated FAP and an identical APC germline pathogenic variant [Burt et al 2004, Neklason et al 2008]:

  • The median number of adenomatous polyps in 120 individuals with pathogenic variants was 25 (range 0-470);
  • Forty-four (~37%) of 120 individuals with pathogenic variants for whom detailed colonoscopy records were available had fewer than ten adenomatous polyps;
  • Three of the 44 individuals with pathogenic variants who had fewer than ten polyps had colorectal cancer; one of the three was diagnosed before age 30 years.

Additional findings in attenuated FAP can include the following:

  • Upper gastrointestinal polyps and cancers, similar to that seen in FAP
  • Certain extraintestinal manifestations of FAP; however, CHRPE and desmoid tumors are rare [Burt 2003, Knudsen et al 2003, Burt et al 2004].
  • Thyroid cancer [Truta et al 2003, Burt et al 2004]

Gastric Adenocarcinoma and Proximal Polyposis of the Stomach (GAPPS)

Gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS) was first described in 2012 in three families with fundic gland polyposis and intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma [Worthley et al 2012]. Individuals with GAPPS in this study were reportedly at higher risk for gastric cancer than those with FAP/attenuated FAP and a normal gastric antrum, pylorus, small intestine, and colon [Worthley et al 2012]. Genetic testing of APC and other genes did not initially reveal any causative pathogenic variants in the three original families [Worthley et al 2012]. Subsequently, these three families, in addition to three new families with GAPPS, were found to have disease-associated variants in the Ying Yang 1 (YY1) binding motif of promoter 1B of APC [Li et al 2016]. The promoter 1B disease-associated variants tracked with GAPPS in all six families [Li et al 2016].

Another family with GAPPS was also found to have a YYI promoter 1B disease-associated variant in APC [Repak et al 2016]. Metastatic gastric cancer developed in one of the individuals despite endoscopic surveillance with multiple biopsies taken during each procedure [Repak et al 2016]. Two other individuals from this family underwent gastroscopies; multiple biopsies during each procedure revealed fundic gland polyposis with low-grade and focally high-grade dysplasia but no invasive cancer [Repak et al 2016]. Subsequent gastrectomy in both individuals revealed early-stage gastric adenocarcinoma (Stage IA) [Repak et al 2016].

It is thought that the reason that promoter 1B disease-associated variants result in a gastric but not colonic polyposis phenotype is that the 1B promoter drives APC expression solely in the stomach; the 1A promoter that drives APC expression in the colon is inactivated by methylation in stomach tissue. Thus, normal APC expression occurs in the colon in GAPPS via the 1A promoter but APC expression is lost in the stomach due to methylation of the 1A promoter and mutation of the 1B promoter.

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

Although variation occurs among individuals and among and within families with identical APC pathogenic variants [Giardiello et al 1994, Friedl et al 2001], much effort has gone into making genotype-phenotype correlations. Some have suggested basing management strategies on these associations [Vasen et al 1996], whereas others feel that therapeutic decisions should not be based on genotype [Friedl et al 2001].

While not in routine use at present, the following correlations may become important in management decisions in the future (see Table 3 for reference sequences for pathogenic variants discussed in this section):

  • The most frequent APC pathogenic variant is located at codon 1309 (c.3927_3931delAAAGA) [Friedl & Aretz 2005]. Pathogenic variants at this codon lead to a high number of colonic adenomas at an early age [Friedl et al 2001, Bertario et al 2003].
  • The average age of onset in individuals with colonic symptoms [Friedl et al 2001] varied by pathogenic variant location:
    • At codon 1309: age 20 years
    • Between codon 168 and 1580 (excluding 1309): age 30 years
    • 5' of codon 168 and 3' of codon 1580: age 52 years
  • Profuse polyposis (an average of 5000 polyps) has been reported with pathogenic variants in codons 1250-1464 [Nagase et al 1992].
  • Attenuated FAP is associated with the following:
    • Pathogenic variants (usually truncating variants) in the 5' part of the gene (codons 1-177) [Sieber et al 2006], exon 9 [van der Luijt et al 1995, Soravia et al 1998, Sieber et al 2006], and the distal 3' end of the gene [Friedl et al 1996, van der Luijt et al 1996, Walon et al 1997, Sieber et al 2006]
    • Interstitial deletions of chromosome 5q22 that include APC [Pilarski et al 1999]
    • Partial and whole-gene deletions [Nielsen et al 2007a]
    • Somatic mosaicism for APC pathogenic variants that are generally associated with FAP [Friedl & Aretz 2005, Aretz et al 2007, Hes et al 2008]
  • A fourfold increased risk for duodenal adenomas was found in individuals with pathogenic variants between codons 976 and 1067 in one study of Italian individuals with FAP [Bertario et al 2003].
  • Prominent extracolonic manifestations often correlate (though not completely) with more distal APC pathogenic variants. A retrospective study of 190 individuals with FAP that evaluated nine extracolonic manifestations (desmoid tumors, osteomas, epidermoid cysts, duodenal adenomas, gastric polyps, hepatoblastoma, dental anomalies, periampullary cancers, and brain tumors) [Wallis et al 1999] revealed that:
    • Individuals with pathogenic variants in codons 1395-1493 have significantly higher rates of desmoid tumors, osteomas, and epidermoid cysts than those with pathogenic variants in codons 177-452;
    • Individuals with pathogenic variants in codons 1395-1493 have significantly higher rates of desmoid tumors and osteomas than those with pathogenic variants in codons 457-1309;
    • No individuals with pathogenic variants in codons 177-452 developed osteomas or periampullary cancers;
    • Only individuals with pathogenic variants in codons 457-1309 developed hepatoblastoma and/or brain tumors.
  • Desmoid tumors also have shown the following correlations:
    • After reviewing combined data on 2098 individuals with FAP, Sinha et al [2011] found that APC pathogenic variants 3’ to codon 1399 were associated with desmoid tumor development with an odds ratio of 4.37.
    • A study of 269 individuals with identifiable APC pathogenic variants found desmoid tumors in 20% of individuals with pathogenic variants 5' to codon 1444, 49% of individuals with pathogenic variants 3' to codon 1444, and 61% of individuals with pathogenic variants in codons 1445-1580 [Friedl et al 2001].
    • Several families with severe desmoid tumors with pathogenic variants at the extreme 3' end of the gene have been reported [Eccles et al 1996, Scott et al 1996, Couture et al 2000].
    • Nieuwenhuis & Vasen [2007] revealed a consistent association of desmoid tumors with pathogenic variants distal to codon 1444.
    • The data regarding desmoid tumors and genotype associations is controversial. Church et al [2015] recently evaluated the association between incidence and severity of desmoid disease in FAP and genotype. Although a higher incidence was found with pathogenic variants 3’ of codon 1399, the authors concluded that desmoid disease can develop regardless of the APC mutation site [Church et al 2015]. Additionally, pathogenic variants in this region are more often symptomatic and lethal [Church et al 2015].
  • CHRPE is associated with:
    • Pathogenic variants between codons 148 to 2043 [Burger et al 2011];
    • APC whole-gene deletions [Aretz et al 2005].
  • In individuals with thyroid cancer and FAP:
    • In 24 individuals, the majority of pathogenic variants identified were 5' to codon 1220 [Cetta et al 2000];
    • Nine of 12 individuals had APC pathogenic variants identified proximal to the mutation cluster region (codons 1286-1513) [Truta et al 2003].
  • A review of the literature up to August 2006 and a report of additional affected individuals by Nielsen et al [2007a] revealed 89 submicroscopic APC deletions (42 partial and 47 whole-gene deletions). Most partial and whole APC deletions are associated with 100-2000 colonic adenomas, although attenuated FAP has been seen [Nielsen et al 2007a]. Extracolonic findings were seen in 36% of individuals, with no significant differences in those with partial- vs. whole-gene deletions [Nielsen et al 2007a]. One whole-gene deletion and one partial-gene deletion were found in 94 individuals with FAP [Smith et al 2016]. In six other reports of individuals with whole- or partial-gene deletions, all were classified as having a phenotype consistent with FAP as opposed to attenuated FAP [Quadri et al 2015].

Penetrance

In FAP, the penetrance of colonic adenomatous polyposis and colon cancer is virtually 100% in untreated individuals.

In attenuated FAP, the penetrance of colonic polyposis is less well understood, although the estimate of colon cancer risk by age 80 years is approximately 70% [Neklason et al 2008].

In GAPPS, the penetrance of gastrointestinal polyps and cancer is currently unknown.

See Clinical Description for discussion of penetrance of other intestinal and extraintestinal manifestations in APC-associated polyposis conditions.

Nomenclature

FAP is also known as familial polyposis coli. A term used historically for FAP is adenomatous polyposis coli (i.e., APC); APC now refers to the relevant gene. FAP is often referred to as classic FAP when more than 100 colorectal polyps are present. Classic FAP and FAP may be used interchangeably.

Gardner syndrome is the association of colonic adenomatous polyposis of FAP with osteomas and soft tissue tumors (epidermoid cysts, fibromas, desmoid tumors) [Gardner & Richards 1953]. When these findings are prominent, many clinicians continue to use the term Gardner syndrome. However, they can occur in any individual with FAP, whether or not other extraintestinal findings are present. Gardner syndrome was once thought to be a distinct clinical entity; however, it is now known that pathogenic variants in APC give rise to both FAP and Gardner syndrome. Other manifestations of FAP (e.g., upper gastrointestinal polyposis) are also found in Gardner syndrome. Some correlation exists between extraintestinal growths and pathogenic variant location in APC. See Genotype-Phenotype Correlations.

Turcot syndrome is the association of colonic polyposis or colorectal cancer and central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Historically, Turcot syndrome was used to describe individuals with either FAP or Lynch syndrome (see Differential Diagnosis) who also had CNS tumors. The molecular basis of Turcot syndrome is either an APC pathogenic variant associated with FAP or a pathogenic variant in one of the genes associated with Lynch syndrome [Hamilton et al 1995]. The CNS tumors in individuals with APC pathogenic variants are typically medulloblastoma, whereas those with Lynch syndrome are usually glioblastoma multiforme. Like Gardner syndrome, Turcot syndrome was once thought to be a distinct clinical entity; however, it is now assumed that all individuals with FAP are at increased risk for brain tumors, albeit a relatively low lifetime risk. Thus, Turcot syndrome is a historical term of little clinical utility.

Attenuated FAP (also referred to as attenuated adenomatous polyposis coli) appears to be the same as the "hereditary flat adenoma syndrome" [Lynch et al 1992].

Prevalence

Estimates of the prevalence of FAP vary from 1:6,850 to 1:31,250 live births (2.29 to 3.2 cases per 100,000 individuals) [Bussey 1975, Järvinen 1992, Bisgaard et al 1994, Bülow et al 1996, Björk et al 1999, Iwama et al 2004, Scheuner et al 2010]. The frequency is fairly constant throughout the world, with men and women being affected equally.

Attenuated FAP is likely underdiagnosed, given the lower number of colonic polyps and lower risk for colorectal cancer compared to FAP [Neklason et al 2008].

The prevalence of GAPPS is currently unknown.

APC-associated polyposis conditions historically accounted for about 0.5% of all colorectal cancers; this figure is declining as more at-risk family members undergo successful treatment following early polyp detection and prophylactic colectomy.

Differential Diagnosis

APC-associated polyposis conditions may be distinguished from other inherited colon cancer conditions and other gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes by molecular genetic testing, histopathologic findings, and phenotypic characteristics.

Hereditary Disorders to Consider in the Differential Diagnosis

MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP). The colonic phenotype of MAP can be similar to attenuated FAP but is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. Germline biallelic pathogenic variants in MUTYH predispose individuals to multiple adenoma or polyposis coli. If an APC pathogenic variant is not identified in an individual with colonic polyposis, molecular genetic testing of MUTYH should be considered [Sieber et al 2003].

Biallelic MUTYH pathogenic variants have been found in a few individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer at age 50 years or younger who have had few or no polyps [Wang et al 2004]. The frequency of duodenal polyposis is between 4% and 25% among individuals with biallelic MUTYH pathogenic variants; extraintestinal findings are also noted on occasion [Aretz et al 2006].

In one study of individuals with polyposis without an identified APC pathogenic variant, the detection rate of MUTYH pathogenic variants varied by the colonic severity [Aretz et al 2006]; biallelic MUTYH pathogenic variants were found in:

  • Forty (18%) of 227 individuals diagnosed with ten to 100 polyps after age 25 years or more than 100 polyps after age 45 years;
  • Seven (27%) of 26 individuals with more than 100 polyps diagnosed between ages 35 and 45 years;