Cornelia De Lange Syndrome

Summary

Clinical characteristics.

Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS) encompasses a spectrum of findings from mild to severe. Severe (classic) CdLS is characterized by distinctive facial features, growth restriction (prenatal onset; <5th centile throughout life), hypertrichosis, and upper-limb reduction defects that range from subtle phalangeal abnormalities to oligodactyly (missing digits). Craniofacial features include synophrys, highly arched and/or thick eyebrows, long eyelashes, short nasal bridge with anteverted nares, small widely spaced teeth, and microcephaly. Individuals with a milder phenotype have less severe growth, cognitive, and limb involvement, but often have facial features consistent with CdLS. Across the CdLS spectrum IQ ranges from below 30 to 102 (mean: 53). Many individuals demonstrate autistic and self-destructive tendencies. Other frequent findings include cardiac septal defects, gastrointestinal dysfunction, hearing loss, myopia, and cryptorchidism or hypoplastic genitalia.

Diagnosis/testing.

The diagnosis of CdLS is established in a proband with suggestive clinical features and/or by identification of a heterozygous pathogenic variant in NIPBL, RAD21, SMC3, or BRD4, or a hemizyous pathogenic variant in HDAC8 or SMC1A by molecular genetic testing.

Management.

Treatment of manifestations: Aggressive management of gastroesophageal reflux with assessment of potential gastrointestinal malrotation; consideration of fundoplication if reflux is severe. Supplementary formulas and/or gastrostomy tube placement to meet nutritional needs as necessary. Physical, occupational, and speech therapy to optimize psychomotor development and communication skills. Standard treatment for epilepsy, vision issues, nasolacrimal duct obstruction, hearing loss, cleft palate, anomalies of tooth formation and/or position, cardiac defects, cryptorchidism/hypospadias, bicornuate uterus, vesicoureteral reflux, anemia and/or thrombocytopenia, and immunodeficiency. If surgery is being considered, malignant hyperthermia precautions and preoperative evaluation for thrombocytopenia and cardiac disease with careful monitoring of the airway during anesthesia are recommended.

Surveillance: At each visit: measurement of growth parameters and evaluation of nutritional status and safety of oral intake; monitor for signs and symptoms of GERD and for evidence of aspiration with respiratory insufficiency; assessment for new manifestations such as seizures or signs of autonomic dysfunction; monitor developmental progress and educational needs; behavioral assessment for anxiety, attention, and aggressive or self-injurious behavior; assessment of mobility and self-help skills. At least annually: ophthalmology evaluation; dental evaluation with cleaning; audiology evaluation in childhood and adolescence.

Genetic counseling.

NIPBL-CdLS, RAD21-CdLS, SMC3-CdLS and BRD4-CdLS are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner; HDAC8-CdLS and SMC1A-CdLS are inherited in an X-linked manner. The majority of affected individuals have a de novo heterozygous pathogenic variant in NIPBL. Fewer than 1% of individuals with autosomal dominant CdLS have an affected parent. When the parents are clinically unaffected, the risk to the sibs of a proband with CdLS is estimated to be 1.5% because of the possibility of germline mosaicism. The risk to sibs of a male proband with X-linked CdLS depends on the status of the proband's mother; the risk to sibs of a female proband with X-linked CdLS depends on the status of the proband's mother and father. Prenatal testing for a pregnancy at increased risk and preimplantation genetic testing are possible for families in which the pathogenic variant has been identified.

Diagnosis

Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS) constitutes a clinical spectrum, with some individuals having milder features and others displaying more severe, classic features. An international consensus statement has defined both cardinal and suggestive features, as well as a scoring system to define classic and non-classic CdLS to assist with clinical genetic testing decisions [Kline et al 2018].

Suggestive Findings

Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS) should be suspected in individuals with the following clinical and radiographic features.

Clinical findings

  • Distinctive craniofacial appearance (often recognizable; see Figure 1) including:
    • Microcephaly (mean occipital frontal circumference <2nd centile)
    • Synophrys with highly arched and/or thick eyebrows
    • Long, thick eyelashes
    • Short nasal bridge, upturned nasal tip with anteverted nares
    • Long and/or smooth philtrum, thin vermilion of the upper lip, downturned corners of the mouth
    • Highly arched palate with or without cleft palate
    • Small widely spaced teeth
    • Micrognathia with or without mandibular spurs
  • Growth failure, which may be detected prenatally and persists postnatally
  • Developmental delay / intellectual disability, varying from mild to profound
  • Limb abnormalities (either symmetric or asymmetric) ranging from severe reduction defects with complete absence of the forearms, to various forms of oligodactyly (missing digits) involving primarily the upper extremities, to small hands (micromelia) and phalangeal abnormalities (5th digit clinodactyly and short first metacarpal resulting in a proximally placed thumb) at the mild end
  • Hypertrichosis. Thick scalp hair that often extends onto the temporal regions and at times involves the face, ears, back, and arms
Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Classic CdLS craniofacial features

Radiographic findings. In those without limb deficiencies, the presence of a short first metacarpal on plain x-ray resulting in a proximally placed thumb can be useful in diagnosis.

Establishing the Diagnosis

The diagnosis of CdLS is established in a proband with the above clinical features and/or by the identification on molecular genetic testing of a heterozygous pathogenic variant in NIPBL, RAD21, SMC3, or BRD4 or a hemizyous pathogenic variant in HDAC8 or SMC1A (see Table 1).

Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination of gene-targeted testing (serial single-gene testing or multigene panel) and comprehensive genomic testing (exome sequencing, exome array, genome sequencing) depending on the phenotype.

Gene-targeted testing requires that the clinician determine which gene(s) are likely involved, whereas genomic testing does not. Because the phenotype of Cornelia de Lange syndrome can be broad, individuals with distinctive features described in Suggestive Findings are likely to be diagnosed using gene-targeted testing (see Option 1), whereas those in whom the diagnosis of Cornelia de Lange syndrome has not been considered are more likely to be diagnosed using genomic testing (see Option 2).

Option 1

When the phenotypic findings suggest the diagnosis of Cornelia de Lange syndrome, molecular genetic testing approaches include use of a multigene panel or serial single gene testing.

A Cornelia de Lange syndrome multigene panel that contains at least NIPBL, SMC1A, HDAC8, SMC3, RAD21 and BRD4 and several additional genes that can cause a phenotype resembling CdLS, such as AFF4, ANKRD11, CREBBP, and EP300 (see Differential Diagnosis), is the most effective way of detecting causal variants [Kline et al 2018]. Because of the significant frequency of somatic mosaicism [Huisman et al 2013], testing capable of detecting mosaicism, such as next generation sequencing (NGS), should be considered, preferably using uncultured fibroblasts, although buccal cells or bladder epithelial cells can also be used.

This approach is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition at the most reasonable cost while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests. For CdLS, a multigene panel that also includes deletion/duplication analysis is recommended (see Table 1).

For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.

Serial single-gene testing. Sequential molecular genetic testing of NIPBL, SMC1A, HDAC8, SMC3, RAD21 and BRD4 may be considered:

  • For individuals with features strongly suggestive of CdLS who score highly on the international consensus scoring criteria or for whom multigene panel testing is not available, NIPBL sequence analysis may be considered first. If no pathogenic variant is identified, gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis of NIPBL should be considered next.
  • If no NIPBL pathogenic variant is identified and the affected individual has milder physical features of CdLS, consider SMC1A sequence and gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis next.
  • If no NIPBL or SMC1A pathogenic variant is identified and CdLS is highly suspected (especially in an individual with milder features), consider BRD4, SMC3, RAD21, and HDAC8 sequence analysis and gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis.

Option 2

When the diagnosis of Cornelia de Lange syndrome is not strongly considered due to atypical phenotypic features, comprehensive genomic testing (which does not require the clinician to determine which gene[s] are likely involved) is the best option. Exome sequencing is most commonly used; genome sequencing is also possible.

For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.

Table 1.

Molecular Genetic Testing Used in Cornelia de Lange Syndrome

Gene 1, 2Proportion of CdLS
Attributed to Pathogenic
Variants in Gene
Proportion of Probands with a Pathogenic Variant 3 Detectable by Method
Sequence
analysis 4
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 5
BRD4<1%3/4 61/4 6
HDAC8~4%~90% 7~10% 7
NIPBL~80% 8, 9~97% 9~3% 10, 11
RAD21<1% 1220/22 122/22 12
SMC1A~5% 13~100%
SMC31%-2% 14~97%~3%
Unknown3%-5%
1.

Genes are listed in alphabetic order.

2.

See Table A. Genes and Databases for chromosome locus and protein.

3.

See Molecular Genetics for information on allelic variants detected in these genes.

4.

Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include small intragenic deletions/insertions and missense, nonsense, and splice site variants; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.

5.

Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications. Gene-targeted deletion/duplication testing will detect deletions ranging from a single exon to the whole gene; however, breakpoints of large deletions and/or deletion of adjacent genes (e.g., those described by Olley et al [2018]) may not be detected by these methods.

6.

Olley et al [2018]

7.

Ansari et al [2014], Kaiser et al [2014]

8.

Borck et al [2004], Gillis et al [2004], Tonkin et al [2004], Bhuiyan et al [2006], Musio et al [2006], Yan et al [2006], Selicorni et al [2007], Huisman et al [2013]

9.

Somatic mosaicism for NIPBL has been reported in approximately 10%-15% of individuals. Obtaining a buccal sample at the time of collecting a peripheral blood sample can be considered [Huisman et al 2013]. Screening for NIPBL mosaicism can be pursued if CdLS is strongly suspected and molecular genetic testing on a peripheral blood sample is normal.

10.

Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis of NIPBL detects ~3% of NIPBL-CdLS [Pehlivan et al 2012, Russo et al 2012, Ansari et al 2014].

11.

Cytogenetic testing or chromosomal microarray (CMA) may also be considered in those with classic features of CdLS but normal molecular genetic testing because a few individuals with large deletions of 5p13 that include NIPBL have been reported [Taylor & Josifek 1981, Hulinsky et al 2005, Hayashi et al 2007].

12.

Deardorff et al [2012], Krab et al [2020]

13.

Musio et al [2006], Borck et al [2007], Deardorff et al [2007], Huisman et al [2017]

14.

Gil-Rodríguez et al [2015]

Clinical Characteristics

Clinical Description

While classic Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS) was formally characterized more than 70 years ago and well delineated clinically [Ptacek et al 1963, Jackson et al 1993], the identification of the molecular genetic basis of CdLS has led to the recognition of affected individuals who have milder or atypical features. Therefore, this condition encompasses a spectrum of findings from mild to severe (see Phenotype Correlations by Gene). Those with a milder phenotype, which is less striking clinically than the classic form of CdLS, may represent the majority of individuals with CdLS [Deardorff et al 2007, Rohatgi et al 2010].

Table 2.

Features of Cornelia de Lange Syndrome

Feature% of Persons w/FeatureComment
Synophrys98% 1In individuals w/classic features
Feeding difficulties>95%
Growth failure>95%May be noted prenatally
Intellectual disability>95%Typically severe to profound in those w/classic CdLS
Small hands & feet>90%
Microbrachycephaly>90%
Long eyelashes>90%
Thin upper vermilion border of lip>90%
Downturned corners of mouth>90%
Dental problems>90%Delayed secondary tooth eruption, small or absent teeth, malposition, overcrowding, caries due to GERD, periodontal disease, & bruxism
Hypertrichosis>80%Involving the face, ears, back, & arms
Hearing loss80%>40% have profound SNHL, although hearing loss may improve over time.
Micrognathia80%In those w/classic features
Radial head underdevelopment79%
Gastroesophageal reflux disease75%
Clinodactyly70%
Nasolacrimal duct obstruction70%
Ptosis60%
Cutis marmorata60%
Self-injurious behavior56%
Sleep difficulties50%
Mandibular spurs42%
Scoliosis33%
High & arched palate w/clefting30%
Congenital heart defects30%Most commonly pulmonic or peripheral pulmonic stenosis, VSD, & ASD
Seizures25%
Oligodactyly25%

Features and frequencies are largely derived from Jackson et al [1993], Kline at al [2018] and references therein.

ASD = atrial septal defect; GERD = gastroesophageal disease; SNHL = sensorineural hearing loss; VSD = ventricular septal defect

Growth. Prenatal-onset growth failure is present in a majority of individuals with CdLS. Symmetric slow growth resulting in proportionate short stature becomes more significant by age six months. Mean height and weight are below the fifth centile throughout life [Boog et al 1999] in individuals with classic CdLS. Growth may be less severely affected in those with overall milder clinical features and/or mosaic pathogenic variants. In addition, failure to thrive may be superimposed on the constitutional growth restriction secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease and other issues with feeding (see Gastrointestinal below).

CdLS-specific growth charts have been developed. See www.cdlsusa.org (girls; boys).

Intellectual disability. Most individuals with CdLS have developmental delay. The overall range of IQ levels is broad, from below 30 to 102, with an average IQ of 53 [Kline et al 1993, Saal et al 1993]. Those affected individuals with classic features are more likely to have severe-to-profound intellectual disability (see Genotype-Phenotype Correlations).

  • Expressive language is often more compromised than receptive language, and receptive language more compromised than cognition [Ajmone et al 2014].
  • Effective verbal and nonverbal communication skills can facilitate quality of life enormously [Kline et al 2018]. Early augmentative and alternative communication interventions are highly effective [Ajmone et al 2014].
  • Half of children walk by 24 months and 95% by age ten. Half of children are able to feed themselves by age three years and 95% by age ten [Kline et al 1993].

Behavior. A range of behavioral issues have been reported [Kline et al 2018].

  • Behavior problems are often directly related to frustration from an inability to communicate (see Intellectual disability above).
  • Difficulties in sensory processing can lead to hyposensitivity, hypersensitivity, disorientation, and fixation.
  • Autistic behavior may lead to avoidance or rejection of social interaction and physical contact.
  • Repetitive behaviors, which can be exacerbated by anxiety, are common and are associated with more marked intellectual disability and autistic features.
  • Clinically significant self-injurious behavior occurs in 56% of individuals, with hand-directed self-injurious behavior the most common.

Neurologic. Overall, approximately 25% of individuals with CdLS have seizures. Partial epilepsy is the most common type with age of onset typically before age two years. Most affected individuals respond well to standard medical therapy and are able to be weaned off medical therapy after a few years [Verrotti et al 2013] (see Management, Treatment of Manifestations).

Limb involvement. Severe abnormalities of the upper extremities are seen in 25% of individuals with CdLS.

  • Upper-extremity deficiencies ranging from severe reduction defects with complete absence of the forearms to various forms of oligodactyly (missing digits) are present in about one third of those with classic features.
  • In the absence of limb deficiency, micromelia (small hands), proximally placed thumbs, and fifth-finger clinodactyly occur in nearly all individuals (see Figure 3).
  • Radioulnar synostosis is common and may result in flexion contractures of the elbows.
  • The lower extremities are less involved than the upper extremities. The feet are often small and syndactyly of the second and third toes occurs in more than 80% of affected individuals [Jackson et al 1993].
Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Range of limb anomalies in CdLS

Gastrointestinal. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is present in a majority of affected indivdiuals. Other complications of GERD including esophagitis, aspiration, chemical pneumonitis, and irritability can be avoided by diagnosis and treatment of GERD in the neonatal period (see Management). Approximately one third have evidence of aspiration and 15% require a feeding tube [Luzzani et al 2003]. Other gastrointestinal abnormalities include:

  • Pyloric stenosis (4%), the most frequent cause of persistent vomiting in the newborn period
  • Intestinal malrotation (2%)
  • Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) (1%)
    CDH has been diagnosed both pre- and postnatally, but may be underascertained, especially in infants who die in the perinatal period.

Ophthalmologic. As many as 60% of affected individuals demonstrate some degree of ptosis as well as other ocular problems including myopia (60%) and nystagmus (37%) [Levin et al 1990]. Other ophthalmologic abnormalities:

  • Nasolacrimal duct stenosis
  • Glaucoma
  • Microcornea
  • Astigmatism
  • Optic atrophy
  • Coloboma of the optic nerve
  • Strabismus
  • Proptosis

Otolaryngologic. Sensorineural hearing impairment is noted in 40% of children with CdLS, and conductive hearing impairment in 60% [Marchisio et al 2014]. Notably, for a significant proportion hearing loss (both sensorineural and conductive) improves over time [Janek et al 2016]

Genitourinary. Renal abnormalities, primarily vesicoureteral reflux, have been reported in 12%.

  • Cryptorchidism occurs in 73% of males with CdLS
  • Hypoplastic (small) genitalia occur in 57% and hypospadias in 9% of males [Jackson et al 1993]
  • Bicornuate uterus, which can cause abdominal pain, has been observed in five (25%) of 20 affected females [Oliver et al 2010, Kline et al 2015].

Cardiovascular. Approximately 30% of individuals with CdLS have congenital heart disease [Chatfield et al 2012]. The most common abnormalities include (in descending order):

  • Pulmonic or peripheral pulmonic stenosis
  • Ventricular septal defects
  • Atrial septal defects
  • Coarctation or hypoplastic aortic arch
  • Aortic valve anomaly
  • Tetralogy of Fallot
  • Double-outlet right ventricle
  • Atrioventricular canal defect

Immunologic. Antibody deficiency has been described in several individuals with CdLS, indicating a need for immunologic screening and management of immunodeficiency in those affected individuals with severe or recurrent infections [Jyonouchi et al 2013]. The most common reported recurrent infections include chronic ear infections, chronic viral respiratory infections, and pneumonia. Impaired T-cell function may be associated with antibody deficiencies observed in persons with CdLS.

Hematologic. Thrombocytopenia often resolves after infancy, but can rarely transition to persistent idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura [Lambert et al 2011]. In most cases, anemia is transient.

Other features

  • A characteristic low-pitched cry that tends to disappear in late infancy has been described in 75% of children with CdLS and is associated with more severe cases [Jackson et al 1993].
  • Hypoplastic nipples and umbilicus are seen in 50%.

Prognosis. The majority of familial cases suggest that expressivity is relatively consistent within a family. In the absence of severe congenital anomalies of internal organs, life expectancy is not significantly reduced.

  • Beck & Fenger [1985] studied mortality in 48 individuals with CdLS born between 1917 and 1982 and found a modest increase in mortality over the general population when comparing cumulative survival rates; the increase is more significant among the younger age groups. They also reported two individuals who died at ages 54 and 61 years.
  • Schrier et al [2011] reported 295 affected individuals in whom a cause of death was known. Respiratory causes, including aspiration/reflux and pneumonias, were the most common primary causes (31%), followed by gastrointestinal disease, including obstruction/volvulus (19%). Congenital anomalies accounted for 15% of deaths and included congenital diaphragmatic hernia and congenital heart defects. Acquired cardiac disease accounted for 3% of deaths. Neurologic causes and accidents each accounted for 8%, sepsis for 4%, cancer for 2%, renal disease for 1.7%, and other causes 9% of deaths.

Phenotype Correlations by Gene

NIPBL

Individuals with classic findings of CdLS, including characteristic facial features and limb anomalies, are more likely to have a pathogenic variant in NIPBL.

Other Genes

Milder phenotypes that retain some of the characteristic facial features but with variable cognitive and limb or structural involvement compared to individuals with a pathogenic variant in NIPBL have been consistently described and can be seen in individuals with a heterozygous pathogenic variant in BRD4, SMC3 or RAD21 or a hemizygous pathogenic variant in HDAC8 or SMC1A [Deardorff et al 2007, Selicorni et al 2007, Rohatgi et al 2010, Kaiser et al 2014, Minor et al 2014, Gil-Rodríguez et al 2015, Olley et al 2018] (see Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Affected individual with a pathogenic variant in SMC1A

SMC1A and SMC3

  • Individuals with SMC1A or SMC3 pathogenic variants typically have fewer structural anomalies and less severe growth restriction than those with NIPBL pathogenic variants; however, they have significant intellectual disability that can range from moderate to severe [Deardorff et al 2007, Gil-Rodríguez et al 2015, Huisman et al 2017].
  • Compared to individuals with a heterozygous NIPBL pathogenic variant, the facial features in those with SMC1A or SMC3 pathogenic variants include slightly flatter and broader eyebrows and a broader and longer nasal bridge [Rohatgi et al 2010].
  • Those with pathogenic variants in SMC3 specifically often have subtle or absent synophrys, wider bulbous nose, and a long but well-formed philtrum.
  • Cardiac malformations, although typically mild, are also observed (~56%) in individuals with SMC3 pathogenic variants, and less frequently in individuals with SMC1A pathogenic variants [Gil-Rodríguez et al 2015].

RAD21. Individuals with a heterozygous RAD21 pathogenic variant:

  • Typically do not have major structural differences.
  • Have milder cognitive impairment compared to those with classic CdLS.
    Specifically, 10% have normal cognition, 45% have mild cognitive impairment and none have severe or profound cognitive disability [Krab et al 2020].
  • Often display growth restriction, minor skeletal anomalies, and facial features that overlap with CdLS [Deardorff et al 2012, Krab et al 2020].

HDAC8

  • Males with a hemizygous pathogenic variant in HDAC8 have facial features that overlap with CdLS but typically display delayed closure of the anterior fontanelle, hooded eyelids, widely spaced eyes, a wide nose, mosaic skin pigmentation, dental anomalies, and happy or friendly personalities. Growth also tends to be less severely affected with lower frequency of postnatal growth restriction and microcephaly reported.
  • Females. The clinical presentation for a female with a heterozygous pathogenic variant in HDAC8 overlaps that of males, but the severity is greatly influenced by the pattern of X inactivation [Kaiser et al 2014].

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

NIPBL. Individuals with pathogenic missense variants and in-frame deletions in NIPBL have been found to have less severe growth deficiency, milder intellectual disability, and fewer structural anomalies [Gillis et al 2004, Ajmone et al 2014, Ansari et al 2014] compared to those with pathogenic loss-of-function NIPBL variants.

SMC1A. Pathogenic variants that cause a CdLS phenotype are typically missense and can result in a range of severity. Of note, loss of function pathogenic variants in SMC1A cause an early-infantile epileptic encephalopathy (OMIM 301044; see Genetically Related Disorders).

Nomenclature

Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS) was first described by Vrolik in 1849, who reported a case as an extreme example of oligodactyly [Oostra et al 1994]. Brachmann [1916] provided a detailed account of a case of symmetric monodactyly, antecubital webbing, dwarfism, cervical ribs, and hirsutism.

In the 1930s, Cornelia de Lange, a Dutch pediatrician, described two unrelated girls with similar features and named the condition after the city in which she worked: typus degenerativus amstelodamensis [de Lange 1933, de Knecht-van Eekelen & Hennekam 1994]. Some examples in the literature refer to the disorder as Brachmann-de Lange syndrome; however, it is more widely referred to as Cornelia de Lange syndrome in honor of Dr de Lange’s contributions to the understanding of the disorder.

Prevalence

The prevalence of CdLS is difficult to estimate as individuals with milder or variable features are likely under-recognized. Published estimates for the prevalence range from 1:100,000 [Pearce & Pitt 1967] to as high as 1:10,000 [Opitz 1985]. Data from the EUROCAT dataset have estimated the prevalence at 1:50,000 for the classic form of CdLS [Barisic et al 2008]; this figure is less likely to include the milder, more common phenotype.

Differential Diagnosis

Phenotypic overlap with CdLS may be observed in monogenic disorders (see Table 4), chromosome abnormalities, and fetal alcohol syndrome.

Table 4.

Genes of Interest in the Differential Diagnosis of Cornelia de Lange Syndrome

GeneDisorderMOIFeatures of Differential Disorder
Overlapping w/CdLSDistinguishing from CdLS
AFF4CHOPS syndrome (OMIM 616368)ADCognitive impairment, heart defects, short stature, skeletal dysplasiaCoarse facial features, obesity, & pulmonary involvement (features that are not typical for CdLS) 1
ANKRD11 2KBG syndromeADDD/ID, short stature, thick eyebrows & synophrys, anteverted nares 3ID is typically milder; macrodontia, few congenital defects
ASXL1Bohring-Opitz syndrome (BOS)ADDD/ID; prenatal & postnatal growth restriction, microcephaly, hypertrichosis, small feet, facial resemblance w/CdLS (especially infants)Feeding intolerance is usually more severe; high myopia, BOS posture 4, prominent globes
EP300EP300 Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome (RSTS)ADDD/ID, small stature, hypertrichosis, full eyebrows, long lashes, micrognathia, malrotation 5Prominent nose & broad thumbs (both less common in EP300-RSTS than in CREBBP-RSTS) 6
TAF1Intellectual disability syndrome (OMIM 300966)XLDD/ID, long philtrum, anteverted nares, microcephaly, hearing loss 7Generalized hypotonia, long face, protruding ears
TAF6Alazami-Yuan syndrome (OMIM 617126)ARShort stature, microcephaly, clinodactyly, hirsutism, DD/ID, & facial dysmorphism w/long philtrum, thin & arched eyebrows, synophrys 8Widow’s peak (rare)

AD = autosomal dominant; AR = autosomal recessive; CdLS = Cornelia de Lange syndrome; DD = developmental delay; ID = intellectual disability; MOI = mode of inheritance; XL = X-linked

1.

Izumi et al [2015]

2.

KBG syndrome is caused by either a heterozygous pathogenic variant in ANKRD11 or deletion of 16q24.3 that includes ANKRD11.

3.

Ansari et al [2014], Parenti et al [2016]

4.

Individuals with Bohring-Opitz syndrome (BOS) can have a specific limb posture termed "BOS posture," described as an external rotation or adduction of the shoulders with flexion of the wrists and fingers at the metacarpophalangeal joint.

5.

Woods et al [2014]

6.

EP300 pathogenic variants cause a phenotype that resembles RSTS caused by mutation of CREBBP. However, with the exception of the low-hanging columella, the facial features in EP300-RSTS are less marked. Although the thumbs and halluces are broad, angulation is very uncommon. Intellectual disability is variable but is usually less severe and occasionally normal (see Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome).

7.

O'Rawe et al [2015]

8.

Alazami et al [2015], Yuan et al [2015]

Deletions of chromosome 2q31.1 (OMIM 613681). Deletions in this region that encompass the HOXD cluster produce limb reduction defects similar to those seen in CdLS as well as genitourinary and developmental abnormalities [Del Campo et al 1999]. Individuals with deletion of 2q31.1 do not have the characteristic facies of CdLS.

Fryns syndrome can be considered in the differential diagnosis of CdLS, most often due to the presence of diaphragmatic defects (diaphragmatic hernia, eventration, hypoplasia, or agenesis) in both disorders. Fryns syndrome and CdLS are characterized by cardiac and renal anomalies, as well as cleft palate, long philtrum, micrognathia, and distal digital hypoplasia (nails, terminal phalanges). However, other features of Fryns syndrome vary (e.g., widely spaced eyes, broad nasal bridge, and macrostomia). While survival beyond the neonatal period has been rare for Fryns syndrome, severe developmental delay and intellectual disability are common. The molecular diagnosis of Fryns syndrome can be established in proband with suggestive findings and biallelic pathogenic variants in PIGN identified by molecular genetic testing. Genetic heterogeneity for Fryns syndrome remains highly probable, as some individuals with a clinical diagnosis of Fryns syndrome have not had PIGN pathogenic variants identified. See also Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Overview.

Fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS). Features common to both FAS and CdLS include intrauterine growth restriction, failure to thrive, developmental abnormalities, hyperactivity, microcephaly, facial hypertrichosis in the newborn, short palpebral fissures, short nose with anteverted nares, long and smooth philtrum, thin vermilion of the upper lip, and cardiac defects. However, the hands and feet in FAS are not small and speech is less affected than in CdLS. A history of alcohol use during pregnancy is useful in discriminating FAS from CdLS.

Management

Clinical management guidelines for Cornelia de Lange syndrome have been published [Kline et al 2007, Kline et al 2018] (full text).

Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with Cornelia de Lange syndrome, the evaluations summarized in Table 5 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to the diagnosis) are recommended.

Table 5.

Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis in Individuals with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome

System/ConcernEvaluationComment
ConstitutionalMeasurement of growth parametersCdLS-specific growth charts are available. 1
NeurologicNeurologic evalConsider EEG if seizures are a concern.
DevelopmentDevelopmental assessment
  • Motor, adaptive, cognitive, & speech/language eval. Speech therapy is highly recommended to optimize communication skills & should be implemented in 1st 18 mos of life.
  • Eval for early intervention / special education
BehavioralNeuropsychiatric evalFor persons age >12 mos: screen for behavior concerns incl sleep disturbances, ADHD, anxiety, &/or traits suggestive of ASD.
MusculoskeletalConsider radiographs of upper extremitiesTo assess for radioulnar synostosis
Orthopedics / physical medicine & rehab / PT / OT evalTo incl assessment of:
  • Gross motor & fine motor skills
  • Limb deficiencies
  • Scoliosis
  • Mobility, activities of daily living, & need for adaptive devices
  • Need for PT (to improve gross motor skills) &/or OT (to improve fine motor skills)
Gastrointestinal/
Feeding
Gastroenterology / nutrition / feeding team eval
  • Consider upper GI series to evaluate for malrotation.
  • Consider endoscopy, pH probe for severe or refractory GERD.
  • Eval of aspiration risk
  • Eval of nutritional status
  • Consider eval for gastric tube placement in those w/dysphagia &/or aspiration risk.
EyesOphthalmologic evalIncl eval for nasolacrimal duct patency, ptosis, assessment of visual acuity, dilated fundus exam, measurement of intraocular pressure
HearingAudiologic eval 2Assess for hearing loss.
ENT/MouthClinical assessment for cleft palate
  • Examination of palate by both inspection & palpation at diagnosis
  • In case of symptoms of a (submucous) cleft palate, referral for specialist assessment is indicated.
DentalDental assessmentIn infancy in those w/cleft palate or after tooth eruption
CardiovascularEchocardiogramAssessment for congenital heart defects
GenitourinaryAssessment for cryptorchidism &/or hypospadias in malesConsider referral to urologist.
Renal ultrasoundEvaluate for structural kidney anomalies.
Consider VCUG.To assess for vesicoureteral reflux, as clinically indicated
Consider pelvic ultrasound.In females of pubertal age to screen for uterine anomalies
HematologicComplete blood countIf signs of anemia, bruising, &/or bleeding
ImmunologicComplete blood count & immune profile 3If recurrent infections are present, consider referral to immunologist.
Miscellaneous/
Other
Consultation w/clinical geneticist &/or genetic counselorTo incl genetic counseling
Family support/
resources
Assess:
  • Use of community or online resources such as Parent to Parent;
  • Need for social work involvement for parental support;
  • Need for home nursing referral.

ASD = autism spectrum disorder; GERD = gastrointestinal reflux disease; OT = occupational therapy; PT = physical therapy; VCUG = vesicoureterogram

1.

www​.cdlsusa.org (girls; boys)

2.

To include auditory brain stem response testing and otoacoustic emissions testing

3.

Quantitative immunoglobulins; antibodies to tetanus, diptheria, and pneumococcus; B-cell panel; T-cell panel

Treatment of Manifestations

Table 6.

Treatment of Manifestations in Individuals with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome

Manifestation/
Concern
TreatmentConsiderations/Other
Poor weight gain /
Failure to thrive
Feeding therapy; gastrostomy tube placement may be required for persistent feeding issues.
  • Low threshold for clinical feeding eval &/or radiographic swallowing study if clinical signs or symptoms of dysphagia
  • Referral to a nutritionist may be considered.
Gastroesophageal
reflux disease
  • Proactive mgmt of GERD w/very ↓ threshold for medical therapy
  • Standard medication & postprandial positioning
Consider fundoplication if symptoms are severe.
MalrotationSurgical correction
EpilepsyStandard treatment w/AEDs by experienced neurologist
  • Many AEDs may be effective; none demonstrated effective specifically for CdLS.
  • Education of parents/caregivers 1
DD/IDSee Developmental Delay / Intellectual Disability Management Issues.Early implementation of speech therapy
Limb defectsConsideration of surgical intervention of arms/handsRarely needed
Orthopedics / physical medicine & rehabilitation / PT / OTConsider need for positioning & mobility devices, disability parking placard.
Ptosis, strabismus,
&/or abnormal vision
Standard treatment(s) as recommended by ophthalmologistCommunity vision services through early intervention or school district
Nasolacrimal duct
obstruction
Aggressive treatment per ophthalmologistMassage therapy is often unsuccessful because of narrow malformed ducts.
HearingHearing aids may be helpful; per otolaryngologist.Community hearing services through early intervention or school district
Cleft palateStandard treatment per multidisciplinary craniofacial team, if possible
Anomalies of tooth
formation &/or
positioning
Standard treatment per dentist &/or orthodontist
Congenital heart
defects
Standard treatment per cardiologist
Cryptorchidism/
Hypospadias
Standard treatment by urologist
Vesicoureteral
reflux
Bicornuate uterusStandard treatment per gynecologist
Anemia &/or
thrombocytopenia
Eval by hematologistSevere thrombocytopenia may require IVIgG &/or steroid treatment.
ImmunodeficiencyStandard treatment by immunologistUnless specific concerns, routine immunizations should be given.
Surgical risks
  • Preoperative eval for thrombocytopenia & cardiac disease
  • Sedation &/or operative procedures w/anesthesiologists experienced in mgmt of small airways present in CdLS
Adverse reactions to midazolam & malignant hyperthermia have been seen, although rare 2 (see Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility).
Family/Community
  • Ensure appropriate social work involvement to connect families w/local resources, respite, & support.
  • Coordinate care to manage multiple subspecialty appointments, equipment, medications, & supplies.
  • Ongoing assessment of need for palliative care involvement &/or home nursing
  • Consider involvement in adaptive sports or Special Olympics.

AED = antiepileptic drug; DD/ID = developmental delay / intellectual disability; GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease; OT = occupational therapy; PT = physical therapy

1.

Education of parents/caregivers regarding common seizure presentations is appropriate. For information on non-medical interventions and coping strategies for children diagnosed with epilepsy, see Epilepsy & My Child Toolkit.

2.

Papadimos & Marco [2003], Stevic et al [2015], Moretto et al [2016]

Developmental Delay / Intellectual Disability Management Issues

The following information represents typical management recommendations for individuals with developmental delay / intellectual disability in the United States; standard recommendations may vary from country to country.

Ages 0-3 years. Referral to an early intervention program is recommended for access to occupational, physical, speech, and feeding therapy as well as infant mental health services, special educators, and sensory impairment specialists. In the US, early intervention is a federally funded program available in all states that provides in-home services to target individual therapy needs.

Ages 3-5 years. In the US, developmental preschool through the local public school district is recommended. Before placement, an evaluation is made to determine needed services and therapies and an individualized education plan (IEP) is developed for those who qualify based on established motor, language, social, or cognitive delay. The early intervention program typically assists with this transition. Developmental preschool is center based; for children too medically unstable to attend, home-based services are provided.

All ages. Consultation with a developmental pediatrician is recommended to ensure the involvement of appropriate community, state, and educational agencies (US) and to support parents in maximizing quality of life. Some issues to consider:

  • Individualized education plan (IEP) services:
    • An IEP provides specially designed instruction and related services to children who qualify.
    • IEP services will be reviewed annually to determine whether any changes are needed.
    • As required by special education law, children should be in the least restrictive environment feasible at school and included in general education as much as possible and when appropriate.
    • Vision and hearing consultants should be a part of the child's IEP team to support access to academic material.
    • PT, OT, and speech services will be provided in the IEP to the extent that the need affects the child's access to academic material. Beyond that, private supportive therapies based on the affected individual's needs may be considered. Specific recommendations regarding type of therapy can be made by a developmental pediatrician.
    • As a child enters the teen years, a transition plan should be discussed and incorporated in the IEP. For those receiving IEP services, the public school district is required to provide services until age 21.
  • A 504 plan (Section 504: a US federal statute that prohibits discrimination based on disability) can be considered for those who require accommodations or modifications such as front-of-class seating, assistive technology devices, classroom scribes, extra time between classes, modified assignments, and enlarged text.
  • Developmental Disabilities Administration (DDA) enrollment is recommended. DDA is a US public agency that provides services and support to qualified individuals. Eligibility differs by state but is typically determined by diagnosis and/or associated cognitive/adaptive disabilities.
  • Families with limited income and resources may also qualify for supplemental security income (SSI) for their child with a disability.

Motor Dysfunction

Gross motor dysfunction

  • Physical therapy is recommended to maximize mobility and to reduce the risk for later-onset orthopedic complications (e.g., contractures, scoliosis, hip dislocation).
  • Consider use of durable medical equipment and positioning devices as needed (e.g., wheelchairs, walkers, bath chairs, orthotics, adaptive strollers).
  • For muscle tone abnormalities including hypertonia or dystonia, consider involving appropriate specialists to aid in management of baclofen, tizanidine, Botox®, anti-parkinsonian medications, or orthopedic procedures.

Fine motor dysfunction. Occupational therapy is recommended for difficulty with fine motor skills that affect adaptive function such as feeding, grooming, dressing, and writing.

Oral motor dysfunction should be assessed at each visit and clinical feeding evaluations and/or radiographic swallowing studies should be obtained for choking/gagging during feeds, poor weight gain, frequent respiratory illnesses, or feeding refusal that is not otherwise explained. Assuming that the child is safe to eat by mouth, feeding therapy (typically from an occupational or speech therapist) is recommended to help improve coordination or sensory-related feeding issues. Feeds can be thickened or chilled for safety. When feeding dysfunction is severe, an NG-tube or G-tube may be necessary.

Communication issues. Consider evaluation for alternative means of communication (e.g., Augmentative and Alternative Communication [AAC]) for individuals who have expressive language difficulties. An AAC evaluation can be completed by a speech-language pathologist who has expertise in the area. The evaluation will consider cognitive abilities and sensory impairments to determine the most appropriate form of communication. AAC devices can range from low-tech, such as picture exchange communication, to high-tech, such as voice-generating devices. Contrary to popular belief, AAC devices do not hinder verbal development of speech, and in many cases can improve it.

Social/Behavioral Concerns

Children may qualify for and benefit from interventions used in treatment of autism spectrum disorder, including applied behavior analysis (ABA). ABA therapy is targeted to the individual child's behavioral, social, and adaptive strengths and weaknesses and typically performed one on one with a board-certified behavior analyst.

Consultation with a developmental pediatrician may be helpful in guiding parents through appropriate behavior management strategies or providing prescription medications, such as medication used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, when necessary.

Concerns about serious aggressive or destructive behavior can be addressed by a pediatric psychiatrist.

Surveillance

Table 7.

Recommended Surveillance for Individuals with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome

System/ConcernEvaluationFrequency
Feeding
  • Measure growth parameters.
  • Evaluate nutritional status & safety of oral intake.
At each visit
GastrointestinalMonitor for signs & symptoms of GERD.
RespiratoryMonitor for evidence of aspiration, respiratory insufficiency.
NeurologicMonitor those w/seizures as clinically indicated.
Assess for new manifestations such as seizures or signs of autonomic dysfunction.
DevelopmentMonitor developmental progress & educational needs.
BehavioralBehavioral assessment for anxiety, attention, & aggressive or self-injurious behavior
MusculoskeletalPhysical medicine, OT/PT assessment of mobility, self-help skills
Miscellaneous/
Other
Assess family need for social work support (e.g., palliative/respite care, home nursing, other local resources) & care coordination.
EyesOphthalmologic evalAt least annually
DentalDental eval & cleaning
HearingAudiology evalAt least annually in childhood & adolescence

GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease; OT = occupational therapy; PT = physical therapy

Evaluation of Relatives at Risk

See Genetic Counseling for issues related to evaluation of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.

Therapies Under Investigation

Search ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder.