Hereditary Leiomyomatosis And Renal Cell Cancer

A number sign (#) is used with this entry because multiple cutaneous and uterine leiomyomatosis with or without renal cell carcinoma, also referred to as hereditary leiomyatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC), is caused by heterozygous mutation in the gene encoding fumarate hydratase (FH; 136850) on chromosome 1q43.

Homozygous mutation in the FH gene causes fumarase deficiency (FMRD; 606812).

Description

Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer is an autosomal dominant tumor predisposition syndrome characterized by the variable development of 3 tumors: cutaneous piloleiomyomata that develop in essentially all patients by age 40 years; leiomyomata (fibroids) of the uterus, and rarely leiomyosarcomas, at a mean age of 30 years (range, 18 to 52 years); and type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma at a mean age of 46 years (range, 17 to 75 years), which occurs in about 20% of patients. Type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma is a pathologic subtype characterized by large tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and pseudostratified nuclei; it shows an aggressive clinical course. Some patients with FH mutations may develop collecting duct renal cell carcinoma. The main focus of management in HLRCC is prevention of disease and death due to renal cancer (summary by Gardie et al., 2011; Smit et al., 2011; and Lehtonen, 2011).

For a general discussion of papillary renal cell carcinoma, see RCCP1 (605074).

Clinical Features

Kloepfer et al. (1958) described 3 Italian half first cousins with multiple leiomyomata of the skin. The parents and common grandparent were not known to be affected, but all critical individuals were not examined. The skin tumors were composed of smooth muscle fibers and were thought to arise from the erector pilorum muscles.

Rudner et al. (1964) described identical twins with multiple cutaneous leiomyomata and a history of hysterectomy for uterine leiomyomata. Mezzadra (1965) described 3 generations of an Italian family with cutaneous leiomyomata associated with uterine myomata. Reed et al. (1973) also emphasized the association of uterine myomata. Engelke and Christophers (1979) commented on the unusually early age of onset of uterine myofibromas. Guillet et al. (1987) described a nonfamilial case of associated multiple cutaneous leiomyomas and uterine fibromas.

Launonen et al. (2001) reported the clinical, histopathologic, and molecular features of a cancer syndrome with predisposition to uterine leiomyomas and papillary renal cell carcinoma. In the Finnish family they studied, 11 members had uterine leiomyomas and 2 had uterine leiomyosarcoma. Seven individuals had a history of cutaneous nodules, 2 of which were confirmed to be cutaneous leiomyomatosis. The 4 kidney cancer cases occurred in young (33- to 48-year-old) females and displayed a unique natural history. All these kidney cancers displayed a distinct papillary histology and presented as unilateral solitary lesions that had metastasized at the time of diagnosis. A second, smaller family was also studied.

In a 55-year-old man with HLRCC and an N64T mutation in the FH gene (136850.0004), Carvajal-Carmona et al. (2006) identified a Leydig cell tumor of the testis. They suggested that this was part of the phenotypic spectrum of HLRCC.

As part of the French National Cancer Institute study, Gardie et al. (2011) identified 44 families with genetically-confirmed HLRCC. Cutaneous leiomyomas occurred in 37 (84.1%) of 44 families and in 102 (67.5%) of 151 affected members. Uterine leiomyomas occurred in 32 families and in 76 (81.7%) of 93 female affected members; renal tumors occurred in 15 (34%) families and in 27 (17.9%) of 151 affected members. The average age at diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma was 43 years (range, 28 to 70 years). Twenty (74.1%) of 27 patient died of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Four patients had isolated type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma, indicating that this can be a sole manifestation of the disorder. There was significant intrafamilial variability.

In a retrospective study, Smit et al. (2011) analyzed 14 families from the Netherlands with genetically-confirmed HLRCC. There was intrafamilial variability, but all families had at least 1 member with multiple cutaneous piloleiomyomas, which manifested between the second and fourth decade of life. These skin lesions tended to grow in size and number over time, and about 75% of patients reported pain or itching. Uterine leiomyomas occurred in 17 of 21 mutation carriers, with most (86%) occurring before 40 years of age. Renal cell cancer occurred in 1 member of 2 unrelated families: 1 patient had type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma at age 30 years, and the other had a Wilms tumor at age 2, although it was unclear if this was related. A patient in a third family had reportedly died of metastatic renal cancer at age 21. Three mutation carriers had other malignancies: 2 with basal cell carcinoma and 1 with leukemia. One patient had an incidental adrenal adenoma.

Inheritance

Based on an Italian family with multiple leiomyomata of the skin, Kloepfer et al. (1958) suggested autosomal dominant inheritance with reduced penetrance. Dominant inheritance with incomplete penetrance was supported by the pedigree of Mezzadra (1965), who described cutaneous leiomyomata associated with uterine myomata in 3 generations of an Italian family.

Weilbaecher (1967) observed a Swedish family with 5 affected members in 3 generations and male-to-male transmission.

Autosomal dominant skin disorders sometimes become manifest in a mosaic form, involving the body in a linear, patchy, or otherwise circumscribed arrangement. Such cases can be explained by an early postzygotic mutation. The segmental lesions usually show the same degree of severity as that found in the corresponding nonmosaic trait, which Happle (1997) referred to as type 1 segmental involvement. Occasionally, however, the intensity of involvement observed in the circumscribed area is far more pronounced. Happle (1997) suggested that this phenomenon can be explained by the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the same locus that caused the less severe, diffuse involvement. Happle (1997) pointed to cutaneous leiomyomatosis as an autosomal dominant disorder in which sporadic cases of segmental leiomyomatosis had been reported by many authors. He referred to this involvement as type 1. He pointed to several families affected with cutaneous leiomyomatosis in which there was superimposed severe segmental leiomyomatosis, providing evidence of type 2 involvement. Sporadic cases showing both severe segmental and ordinary disseminated lesions can be best explained as examples of type 2 involvement.

The transmission pattern of uterine leiomyomas and renal cell cancer in the families studied by Launonen et al. (2001) was consistent with autosomal dominant inheritance.

Diagnosis

Smit et al. (2011) proposed criteria for the clinical diagnosis of HLRCC. The major criterion is multiple cutaneous piloleiomyomas; minor criteria include severely symptomatic early-onset uterine leiomyomas, type 2 papillary renal carcinoma before age 40, and a first-degree relative who meets 1 of the these criteria.

Pathogenesis

Kiuru et al. (2001) concluded that familial cutaneous leiomyomatosis is a 2-hit condition associated with renal cell carcinoma with characteristic histopathology.

Biochemical Features

Pithukpakorn et al. (2006) studied FH enzyme activity in the whole cell and in cytosolic, and mitochondrial fractions in 50 lymphoblastoid and 16 fibroblast cell lines including cell lines from individuals with HLRCC with 16 different mutations. Lower FH enzyme activity was observed in cells from individuals with HLRCC than in cells from normal controls. The enzyme activity in lymphoblastoid cell lines from 3 individuals with mutations in R190 was not significantly different from individuals with other missense mutations. Cell lines from other hereditary renal cancer syndromes showed FH enzyme levels not significantly different from those of control cell lines.

Mapping

Alam et al. (2001) performed a genomewide screen of 11 families with this disorder and found linkage to 1q42.3-q43 (maximum multipoint lod score of 5.40). By haplotype construction and analysis of recombinations, they refined the minimal interval containing the locus, which they designated MCUL1 (multiple cutaneous and uterine leiomyomata), to a region of approximately 14 cM, flanked by markers D1S517 and D1S2842. Allelic loss studies of tumors indicated that MCUL1 may act as a tumor suppressor. Alam et al. (2001) suggested that the MCUL1 gene may harbor low-penetrance variants predisposing to the common form of uterine fibroids and/or may undergo somatic mutation in sporadic leiomyomata.

By genetic marker analysis, Launonen et al. (2001) mapped the gene for hereditary susceptibility to uterine leiomyomas and renal cell cancer, which they called HLRCC, to 1q42-q44. They suggested that the HLRCC gene is likely to be a tumor suppressor.

Molecular Genetics

Following up on the demonstration that both multiple leiomyoma and the leiomyomatosis/renal cell cancer syndrome maps to chromosome 1q42.3-q43, Tomlinson et al. (2002) identified 15 different heterozygous germline mutations in the FH gene (see, e.g., 136850.0003-136850.0006) in 25 families with the disorder. Six families from the U.K. had the same mutation (N64T; 136850.0004). Activity of this enzyme of the tricarboxylic acid cycle was reduced in lymphoblastoid cells from individuals with leiomyomatosis. The enzyme acts as a tumor suppressor in familial leiomyomata, and its measured activity was very low or absent in tumors from individuals with leiomyomatosis, consistent with a Knudson 2-hit hypothesis. The results provided clues to the pathogenesis of fibroids and emphasized the importance of mutations of housekeeping and mitochondrial proteins in the pathogenesis of common types of tumors.

Wei et al. (2006) identified 14 heterozygous mutations in the FH gene, including 9 novel mutations, in affected members of 13 families with HLRCC and 8 families with multiple cutaneous and uterine leiomyomata. Four unrelated families had the R58X mutation (136850.0003), and 5 unrelated families had the R190H mutation (136850.0007). Cutaneous leiomyomata were present in 16 (76%) of 21 families, ranging from mild to severe. All 22 female mutation carriers from 16 families had uterine fibroids. Renal tumors occurred in 13 (62%) of 21 families. No genotype/phenotype correlations were identified.

As part of the French National Cancer Institute study, Gardie et al. (2011) identified 32 different heterozygous germline mutations in the FH gene, including 21 novel mutations, in 40 (71.4%) of 56 families with proven HLRCC. In addition, FH mutations were found in 4 (17.4%) of 23 probands with isolated type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma, including 2 patients with no family history. In vitro functional expression studies showed that all mutations caused about a 50% decrease in FH enzymatic activity. In addition, there were 5 asymptomatic mutation carriers in 3 families, indicating incomplete penetrance. The findings indicated that renal call carcinoma can be the only manifestation of this disorder. No genotype/phenotype correlations were identified.

History

Fryns et al. (1985) described a severely mentally retarded woman with 9p trisomy/18pter monosomy. The patient was judged to have phenotypic features typical of 9p trisomy (Rethore et al., 1970) but she also had multiple cutaneous leiomyomata, of which some were nodular, some linear, and all looked rather like keloids. The authors raised the question of whether this was another example of a specific chromosomal deletion (18pter) in a dominantly inherited multiple tumor, like retinoblastoma and nephroblastoma.