Primary Familial And Congenital Polycythemia

Clinical characteristics.

Primary familial and congenital polycythemia (PFCP) is characterized by isolated erythrocytosis in an individual with a normal-sized spleen and absence of disorders causing secondary erythrocytosis. Clinical manifestations relate to the erythrocytosis and can include plethora, the hyperviscosity syndrome (headache, dizziness, fatigue, lassitude, visual and auditory disturbances, paresthesia, myalgia), altered mental status caused by hypoperfusion and local hypoxia, and arterial and/or venous thromboembolic events. Although the majority of individuals with PFCP have only mild manifestations of hyperviscosity such as dizziness or headache, some affected individuals have had severe and even fatal complications including arterial hypertension, intracerebral hemorrhage, deep vein thrombosis, coronary disease, and myocardial infarction. To date 116 affected individuals from 24 families have been reported.

Diagnosis/testing.

The diagnosis of PFCP is established in a proband with isolated erythrocytosis (hemoglobin and hematocrit above the normal reference range when adjusted for age and sex), normal hemoglobin oxygen affinity measured as P₅₀, erythropoietin (EPO) serum level below or in the lower normal range for laboratory-specific reference values, and a family history consistent with autosomal dominant inheritance. The diagnosis of PFCP can be confirmed in 12%-15% of individuals with these findings by detection of a heterozygous pathogenic variant in EPOR by molecular genetic testing.

Management.

Treatment of manifestations: No management guidelines have been published. While the majority of individuals with PFCP require no regular treatment, some undergo phlebotomy to either treat symptoms of the hyperviscosity syndrome or to maintain the hematocrit at an almost normal level. Some patients require antihypertensive therapy. While low-dose aspirin can be considered for the prevention of thromboembolic events, no evidence of efficacy exists.

Prevention of primary manifestations: Maintain good hydration and avoid activities that potentially increase blood viscosity (e.g., mountain climbing, scuba diving, smoking). For those at increased risk for thromboembolic events: take precautions in higher-risk situations such as long-distance airline flights

Surveillance: Regular cardiology assessment including cardiac function (echocardiography) and blood pressure measurement. Life-long assessment for manifestations/severity of hyperviscosity syndrome and investigation of any suspicious clinical events such as thromboembolic complications.

Agents/circumstances to avoid: Dehydration; activities that could increase blood viscosity (mountain climbing, scuba diving, smoking)

Evaluation of relatives at risk: Presymptomatic diagnosis is warranted in relatives at risk in order to identify as early as possible those who would benefit from education about agents and circumstances to avoid including inappropriate treatments.

Genetic counseling.

PFCP is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. Each child of an individual with PFCP has a 50% chance of inheriting the EPOR pathogenic variant. Once the EPOR pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, prenatal testing for a pregnancy at increased risk and preimplantation genetic testing for PFCP are possible; note, however, that molecular genetic test results cannot predict disease onset or severity.

Suggestive Findings

Primary familial and congenital polycythemia (PFCP) should be suspected in individuals with the following clinical findings, laboratory findings, and family history.

Clinical findings

• No splenomegaly
• Absence of cardiac, pulmonary, and renal disease causing secondary erythrocytosis

Laboratory findings

• Complete blood count that shows isolated absolute erythrocytosis:
  • Normal platelet and white cell counts, which demonstrate non-involvement of other hematopoietic cell lines and confirm isolated erythrocytosis
  • Hemoglobin and hematocrit in at least two separate blood counts performed at different times that are above the normal reference range (adjusted to age and sex) and confirm absolute erythrocytosis
    Note: Absolute erythrocytosis is distinct from: (1) relative erythrocytosis, caused by severe reduction in plasma volume (e.g., due to diuretics or severe diarrhea) and (2) apparent erythrocytosis, caused by arterial hypoxemia (e.g., cigarette smoking, carbon monoxide poisoning, or sleep apnea) (reviewed in McMullin et al [2005]).
• Normal hemoglobin oxygen affinity measured as P₅₀ (i.e., the partial pressure of oxygen in the blood at which hemoglobin is 50% saturated)
• Erythropoietin (EPO) serum level that is below or in the lower normal range (based on laboratory-specific reference values), which excludes secondary erythrocytosis associated with an increased serum EPO level (see Differential Diagnosis)

Family history. Other affected relatives in a pattern consistent with autosomal dominant inheritance

Establishing the Diagnosis

The diagnosis of PFCP can be established in a proband when:

• Clinical findings alone support the diagnosis (i.e., isolated absolute erythrocytosis, normal P₅₀, EPO serum level below or in the lower normal range, and a positive family history consistent with autosomal dominant inheritance);
  AND/OR
• A heterozygous pathogenic variant in EPOR is identified by molecular genetic testing in a proband who represents a simplex case (i.e., a single occurrence in a family) and has some (not all) suggestive findings.

Molecular genetic testing approaches can include single-gene testing when clinical findings strongly support the diagnosis of PFCP or use of a multigene panel in those with suggestive, but not diagnostic, clinical findings:

• Single-gene testing. Sequence analysis identifies a pathogenic EPOR variant in 12%-15% of individuals with isolated erythrocytosis and low serum EPO levels [Kralovics & Prchal 2001, Rives et al 2007, Al-Sheikh et al 2008]. Use of deletion/duplication analysis as a next step can be considered; however, to date no EPOR deletions or duplications causative of PFCP have been reported.
• Use of a multigene panel that includes EPOR and the genes causing secondary erythrocytosis (HBB, BPGM, VHL, EGLN1, and EPAS1) (see Differential Diagnosis) may also be considered, especially for probands who either represent simplex cases (i.e., a single occurrence of PFCP in a family) and/or in whom secondary causes of erythrocytosis have not been excluded. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview; thus, clinicians need to determine which multigene panel is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition at the most reasonable cost while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.
  For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.

Clinical Description

Primary familial congenital polycythemia (PFCP) is characterized by isolated erythrocytosis. To date, PFCP caused by inherited pathogenic variants in EPOR has been reported in 116 individuals from 24 families [Bento et al 2014]. The little information available on its clinical presentation is derived from case reports and the experience of the authors.

Clinical manifestations of PFCP comprise plethora, arterial and venous thromboembolic events, and symptoms caused by increased blood viscosity leading to hypoperfusion and local hypoxia. The hyperviscosity syndrome is characterized by symptoms including headache, dizziness, fatigue, lassitude, visual and auditory disturbances, paresthesia, and myalgia, and may be associated with altered mental status. Of note, the majority of individuals with PFCP have only mild manifestations with hyperviscosity symptoms such as dizziness or headache.

PFCP has been detected – either by chance or due to symptoms – in several children ages six months to 16 years [Arcasoy et al 1997, Furukawa et al 1997, Percy et al 1998, Petersen et al 2004, Rives et al 2007]. Patient hematocrits ranged from 57% to 63%. Clinical manifestations (present in some, but not all) were usually relatively mild (predominantly chronic headache and plethora) and relieved by phlebotomy (see Management).

In contrast, some affected individuals have had severe and even fatal clinical complications such as arterial hypertension, intracerebral hemorrhage, deep vein thrombosis, coronary disease, and myocardial infarction [Prchal et al 1995, Sokol et al 1995, Kralovics et al 1997, Kralovics et al 1998].

The age at diagnosis and the clinical findings vary even within the same family. The descriptions of reported families/cases are examples of the clinical variability observed in this disorder even within the same family.

One of the first families described with PFCP included four affected individuals in three generations who were subsequently found to be heterozygous for a nonsense EPOR pathogenic variant [Prchal et al 1985, Kralovics et al 1998]:

• The proband, who had extensive coronary artery disease and arterial hypertension, died at age 58 years from hemorrhagic stroke.
• Another family member had hypertension and a myocardial infarction at age 40 years.
• The father of a young girl (who initially appeared to be unaffected) had arterial hypertension beginning at age 20 years and one episode of deep vein thrombosis; as a young girl his daughter had a normal blood count but EPO hypersensitivity in erythroid precursor cells (similar to that observed in the 3 other affected family members).

In another family, all three affected individuals were found to have a heterozygous EPOR nonsense pathogenic variant [Rives et al 2007]:

• The proband, a 14-year old boy, was diagnosed with erythrocytosis during evaluation by a pediatric endocrinologist for apparent gynecomastia.
• The mother had had confirmed erythrocytosis during childhood and adolescence; at age 27 years her hemoglobin had been 175 g/L. At the time of the diagnosis of the proband, her hemoglobin was normal; however, her low serum ferritin concentration and transferrin saturation suggested that iron deficiency could be the explanation for her normal hematologic findings.
• The brother of the proband had experienced a deep vein thrombosis at age 18 years. Additional hyperviscosity symptoms which occurred intermittently were relieved by phlebotomies.

A large Finnish family with congenital erythrocytosis (including an Olympic medalist in cross-country skiing) was found to have a heterozygous nonsense EPOR pathogenic variant [de la Chapelle et al 1993].

In a family heterozygous for an EPOR pathogenic variant [Sokol et al 1995]:

• The proband experienced an occipital hemorrhage at age 29 years.
• His two daughters developed asymptomatic erythrocytosis.
• His mother reported headaches and feeling “sluggish,” but had not experienced cerebral or coronary vascular accidents.

A pathogenic EPOR nonsense variant, predicted to result in the shortest truncated EPOR reported to date, was identified in a woman age 30 years followed since childhood for asymptomatic erythrocytosis of unknown cause. Her hemoglobin was 206 g/L, her hematocrit was 61%, and serum EPO level was low; she did not have splenomegaly [Chauveau et al 2016].

EPOR missense variants of uncertain significance were found in a man age 35 years who required regular phlebotomy and in a person age 52 years with a clinical history of recurrent venous thrombosis but no family history of hematologic disorders [Bento et al 2013, Chauveau et al 2016].

Other laboratory findings. Bone marrow erythroid progenitor colonies exhibit EPO hypersensitivity.

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

Given the small number of reported affected individuals to date, it has not been possible to identify any genotype-phenotype correlations; however, it is notable that the age at diagnosis and the clinical findings vary even within the same family.

Penetrance

Data are insufficient to draw any conclusions about penetrance.

Prevalence

Primary familial and congenital polycythemia (PFCP) is a rare disorder; the prevalence is not known. To date, PFCP caused by inherited heterozygous pathogenic variant in EPOR has been reported in 116 individuals in 24 families [Bento et al 2014].

Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with primary familial congenital polycythemia (PFCP), the following evaluations are recommended:

• Full blood counts with evaluation of white blood cells and of platelets, if not performed at the time of diagnosis
• Cardiology assessment including cardiac function (echocardiography) and blood pressure measurement. In case of increased blood pressure, perform 24-hour measurement.
• Recording of symptoms of hyperviscosity syndrome and their severity
  Hyperviscosity syndrome symptoms:
  • Headache
  • Dizziness
  • Altered mentation, sense of distance
  • Visual disturbances
  • Tinnitus
  • Paresthesia
  • Low performance
  • Fatigue, lassitude
  • Myalgia, muscle weakness
  Hyperviscosity syndrome severity:
  • Grade 1. Mild; does not interfere with normal activities
  • Grade 2. Moderate; interferes with some activities
  • Grade 3. Marked to severe; interferes with most or all activities
• Consultation with a clinical geneticist and/or genetic counselor

Treatment of Manifestations

No management guidelines have been published.

The majority of individuals with PFCP require no regular treatment.

In some individuals with PFCP, antihypertensive treatment and phlebotomies are initiated either:

• When symptoms of the hyperviscosity syndrome are evident;
  OR
• At routine intervals to maintain the hematocrit at an almost normal level.

While low-dose aspirin can be considered for the prevention of thromboembolic events, no evidence of efficacy exists. Of note, at least one individual (a male age 40 yrs) died from myocardial infarction despite regularly performed phlebotomies [Prchal & Sokol 1996].

Hyperviscosity symptoms (See Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis.)

• Grade 1. Consider aspirin treatment.
• Grade 2. Consider aspirin treatment. In the presence of persistent symptoms perform phlebotomy. In the event of recurrent episodes consider regular phlebotomy to maintain the hematocrit in the age-respective normal range.
• Grade 3. Consider regular phlebotomy to maintain hematocrit in the age-respective normal range. Consider additional aspirin treatment.

Thromboembolic events

• Provide acute treatment according to established practice for the event.
• Evaluate for other thrombophilic risk factors.
• Start regular phlebotomy to maintain hematocrit in the age-respective normal range. Consider additional aspirin treatment in all patients.
• Consider life-long anticoagulation (e.g., heparins, warfarin) when other severe additional risk factors are present or thromboembolic events have recurred.

Prevention of Primary Manifestations

Always maintain good hydration.

Avoid activities that potentially increase blood viscosity (e.g., mountain climbing, scuba diving, smoking).

For those at increased risk for thromboembolic events: take precautions in higher-risk situations such as long-distance airline flights.

Surveillance

The following are appropriate:

• Regular cardiology assessment including cardiac function (echocardiography) and blood pressure measurement. In case of occasionally increased blood pressure, perform 24-hour measurement.
• Regular life-long follow up with investigation of any suspicious clinical events such as thromboembolic complications and symptoms that could be related to hyperviscosity
• Regular life-long follow up to record manifestations of hyperviscosity syndrome and their severity (See Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis.)

Agents/Circumstances to Avoid

Avoid:

• Dehydration;
• Any activity that would potentially increase blood viscosity.

Evaluation of Relatives at Risk

It is appropriate to evaluate apparently asymptomatic older and younger at-risk relatives of an affected individual in order to identify as early as possible those with PFCP who would benefit from education regarding agents and circumstances to avoid and inappropriate treatments. Evaluations can include the following:

• If the EPOR pathogenic variant in the family is known. Molecular genetic testing
• If no pathogenic variant has been identified in the family. Blood count and serum EPO concentration if hemoglobin and hematocrit are increased

See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.

Pregnancy Management

No information is available on the management of pregnancy in a woman with PFCP.

Although the only survey of pregnancy in women with congenital erythrocytosis did not include any women with an EPOR pathogenic variant, data showed that when treated with low-dose aspirin and phlebotomy to reduce the hematocrit to a suitable level, women with erythrocytosis can have normal pregnancies and give birth to healthy children [McMullin et al 2015].

Therapies Under Investigation

Search ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions.